OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences in the deflation pressure-volume (PV) curves between acute respiratory distress syndrome from pulmonary (ARDSp) and extrapulmonary (ARDSe) origin. DESIGN: . Prospective study. SETTING: Twenty-bed intensive care unit in an university hospital. PATIENTS: Ten patients within the first 24 h from meeting ARDS criteria, classified as ARDSp or ARDSe in a clinical basis. INTERVENTIONS: A deflation PV curve was recorded by means of decreasing steps of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) from 35 to 0 cmH(2)O. RESULTS: The simultaneous recording of pressure at the airway opening (Pao), esophageal pressure (Pes) and volumes (V) allows us to trace the Pao-V, Pes-V and transpulmonary pressure (Ptp)-V curves. These data were fitted to a sigmoid model and ARDSp and ARDSe groups were compared. ARDSp has lower lung compliance and higher chest wall compliance than ARDSe (35.9+/-11.3 vs. 77.2+/-50.6 and 199.6+/-44.4 vs. 125.5+/-16.5 ml/cmH(2)O, respectively, P<0.05). The Pao-V curve in ARDSp is shifted down and right with respect to ARDSe. The Ptp-V curve shows a similar displacement. The Pes-V curve in the ARDSp group is, however, shifted to the left. When relative values (percentage to the maximum volume achieved at 35 cmH(2)O) are considered, these differences persist, but, in the Ptp-V curves, are only significant in the low-pressure range. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between ARDSp and ARDSe PV curves are present all along the pressure axis and are related to differences not only in the Pes-V curve, but also in the Ptp-V curve.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences in the deflation pressure-volume (PV) curves between acute respiratory distress syndrome from pulmonary (ARDSp) and extrapulmonary (ARDSe) origin. DESIGN: . Prospective study. SETTING: Twenty-bed intensive care unit in an university hospital. PATIENTS: Ten patients within the first 24 h from meeting ARDS criteria, classified as ARDSp or ARDSe in a clinical basis. INTERVENTIONS: A deflation PV curve was recorded by means of decreasing steps of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) from 35 to 0 cmH(2)O. RESULTS: The simultaneous recording of pressure at the airway opening (Pao), esophageal pressure (Pes) and volumes (V) allows us to trace the Pao-V, Pes-V and transpulmonary pressure (Ptp)-V curves. These data were fitted to a sigmoid model and ARDSp and ARDSe groups were compared. ARDSp has lower lung compliance and higher chest wall compliance than ARDSe (35.9+/-11.3 vs. 77.2+/-50.6 and 199.6+/-44.4 vs. 125.5+/-16.5 ml/cmH(2)O, respectively, P<0.05). The Pao-V curve in ARDSp is shifted down and right with respect to ARDSe. The Ptp-V curve shows a similar displacement. The Pes-V curve in the ARDSp group is, however, shifted to the left. When relative values (percentage to the maximum volume achieved at 35 cmH(2)O) are considered, these differences persist, but, in the Ptp-V curves, are only significant in the low-pressure range. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between ARDSp and ARDSe PV curves are present all along the pressure axis and are related to differences not only in the Pes-V curve, but also in the Ptp-V curve.
Authors: S Crotti; D Mascheroni; P Caironi; P Pelosi; G Ronzoni; M Mondino; J J Marini; L Gattinoni Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: A Artigas; G R Bernard; J Carlet; D Dreyfuss; L Gattinoni; L Hudson; M Lamy; J J Marini; M A Matthay; M R Pinsky; R Spragg; P M Suter Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: G R Bernard; A Artigas; K L Brigham; J Carlet; K Falke; L Hudson; M Lamy; J R LeGall; A Morris; R Spragg Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1994 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: P Pelosi; P Cadringher; N Bottino; M Panigada; F Carrieri; E Riva; A Lissoni; L Gattinoni Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Edward Abraham; Peter Andrews; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Marco Ranieri; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoît Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-05-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Dick G Markhorst; Jos R C Jansen; Adrianus J van Vught; Huibert R van Genderingen Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-01-20 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Paula Tejera; Nuala J Meyer; Feng Chen; Rui Feng; Yang Zhao; D Shane O'Mahony; Lin Li; Chau-Chyun Sheu; Rihong Zhai; Zhaoxi Wang; Li Su; Ed Bajwa; Amy M Ahasic; Peter F Clardy; Michelle N Gong; Angela J Frank; Paul N Lanken; B Taylor Thompson; Jason D Christie; Mark M Wurfel; Grant E O'Keefe; David C Christiani Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Chun Pan; Lu Chen; Yun-Hang Zhang; Wei Liu; Rosario Urbino; V Marco Ranieri; Hai-Bo Qiu; Yi Yang Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: William R Henderson; Julian Barnbrook; Paolo B Dominelli; Donald Eg Griesdale; Tara Arndt; Yannick Molgat-Seon; Glen Foster; Gareth L Ackland; James Xu; Najib T Ayas; Andrew W Sheel Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp Date: 2014-02-26