Literature DB >> 9308306

Effect of patient position on the consistency of placing the rearfoot at subtalar neutral.

M R Pierrynowski1, S B Smith.   

Abstract

The ability of foot care specialists to place a rearfoot at the subtalar neutral position is important for the care of patients who require foot orthosis prescription, fabrication, and management. Although some clinicians perform this procedure with the patient in the prone position, others prefer a seated or standing approach. This study examined whether patient position and preferred patient position influence the ability of clinicians to place a subject's rearfoot at the subtalar neutral position. The results suggest the following: a clinician's ability to find the subtalar neutral position is better with a seated subject; clinicians do not necessarily perform better assessments on a subject in a position corresponding to their patient position preference; and clinicians who prefer their patients prone generally have more flexible and reproducible observations. In addition, the findings suggest that the nature and relative importance of the tactile and visual cues used by clinicians to place a rearfoot at the subtalar neutral position warrant further exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9308306     DOI: 10.7547/87507315-87-9-399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc        ISSN: 1930-8264


  6 in total

1.  Foot posture in people with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Pazit Levinger; Hylton B Menz; Mohammad R Fotoohabadi; Julian A Feller; John R Bartlett; Neil R Bergman
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Foot kinematics during a bilateral heel rise test in participants with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher Neville; Josh Tome; A Samuel Flemister
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Ankle and foot kinematics associated with stage II PTTD during stance.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher G Neville; Josh Tome; Adolph S Flemister
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 4.  Effectiveness of foot orthoses for treatment and prevention of lower limb injuries : a review.

Authors:  Patria Hume; Will Hopkins; Keith Rome; Peter Maulder; Greg Coyle; Benno Nigg
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Nick A Guldemond; Pieter Leffers; Nicolaas C Schaper; Antal P Sanders; Fred H M Nieman; Geert H I M Walenkamp
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function.

Authors:  Hannah L Jarvis; Christopher J Nester; Peter D Bowden; Richard K Jones
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.303

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.