Literature DB >> 18712943

Effectiveness of foot orthoses for treatment and prevention of lower limb injuries : a review.

Patria Hume1, Will Hopkins, Keith Rome, Peter Maulder, Greg Coyle, Benno Nigg.   

Abstract

Healthcare professionals prescribe foot orthoses (FOs) for treatment and prevention of lower limb injuries, but previous reviews of the effectiveness of FOs have been inconclusive. We have therefore performed a review emphasizing the magnitude of treatment effects to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of FOs in the treatment and prevention of lower limb injuries.Qualifying studies were mainly controlled trials, but some uncontrolled clinical trials of patients with chronic injuries were analysed separately. Injuries included plantar fasciitis, tibial stress fractures and patellofemoral pain syndrome; these were included because of the large treatment costs for these frequent injuries in New Zealand. Outcomes were pain, comfort, function and injury status. Continuous measures were expressed as standardized differences using baseline between-subject standard deviations, and magnitudes were inferred from the intersection of 90% confidence intervals with thresholds of a modified Cohen scale. Effects based on frequencies were expressed as hazard ratios and their magnitudes were inferred from intersection of confidence intervals with a novel scale of thresholds.The effects of FOs for treatment of pain or injury prevention were mostly trivial. FOs were not effective in treating or preventing patellofemoral pain syndrome. Some studies showed moderate effects for treatment of plantar fasciitis. Only a few studies showed moderate or large beneficial effects of FOs in preventing injuries.Customized semi-rigid FOs have moderate to large beneficial effects in treating and preventing plantar fasciitis and posterior tibial stress fractures, and small to moderate effects in treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. Given the limited randomized controlled trials or clinical controlled trials available for the injuries of interest, it may be that more or less benefit can be derived from the use of FOs, but many studies did not provide enough information for the standardized effect sizes to be calculated. Further research with randomized controlled trials is needed to establish the clinical utility of a variety of FOs for the treatment and prevention of various lower limb injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712943     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200838090-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  52 in total

1.  Prevention of stress fractures using custom biomechanical shoe orthoses.

Authors:  A Finestone; M Giladi; H Elad; A Salmon; S Mendelson; A Eldad; C Milgrom
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Can custom-made biomechanic shoe orthoses prevent problems in the back and lower extremities? A randomized, controlled intervention trial of 146 military conscripts.

Authors:  Kristian Larsen; Flemming Weidich; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Relationship between three static angles of the rearfoot and the pattern of rearfoot motion during walking.

Authors:  T G McPoil; M W Cornwall
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 4.  Diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of injuries to the lower leg and foot.

Authors:  R K Duddy; R J Duggan; H J Visser; J S Brooks; T G Klamet
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.182

5.  Effectiveness of foot orthoses to treat plantar fasciitis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Karl B Landorf; Anne-Maree Keenan; Robert D Herbert
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-06-26

6.  Combined effect of foot arch structure and an orthotic device on stress fractures.

Authors:  A Simkin; I Leichter; M Giladi; M Stein; C Milgrom
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1989-08

7.  Anatomical factors associated with overuse sports injuries.

Authors:  L S Krivickas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  The effect of soft foot orthotics on three-dimensional lower-limb kinematics during walking and running.

Authors:  J J Eng; M R Pierrynowski
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1994-09

9.  A prospective study of the effect of a shock-absorbing orthotic device on the incidence of stress fractures in military recruits.

Authors:  C Milgrom; M Giladi; H Kashtan; A Simkin; R Chisin; J Margulies; R Steinberg; Z Aharonson; M Stein
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1985-10

10.  Randomized clinical trial into the impact of rigid foot orthoses on balance parameters in excessively pronated feet.

Authors:  K Rome; C L Brown
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.477

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to prevent sports related injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Mari Leppänen; Sari Aaltonen; Jari Parkkari; Ari Heinonen; Urho M Kujala
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  What are the Benefits and Risks Associated with Changing Foot Strike Pattern During Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Injury, Running Economy, and Biomechanics.

Authors:  Laura M Anderson; Daniel R Bonanno; Harvi F Hart; Christian J Barton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Prioritizing solutions to incorporate Prosthetics and Orthotics services into Iranian health benefits package: Using an analytic hierarchy process.

Authors:  Saeed Shahabi; Shahina Pardhan; Ahmad Ahmadi Teymourlouy; Dimitrios Skempes; Shabnam Shahali; Parviz Mojgani; Maryam Jalali; Kamran Bagheri Lankarani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Dynamic foot function as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Geoffrey J Dowling; George S Murley; Shannon E Munteanu; Melinda M Franettovich Smith; Bradley S Neal; Ian B Griffiths; Christian J Barton; Natalie J Collins
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Dynamic navicular motion measured using a stretch sensor is different between walking and running, and between over-ground and treadmill conditions.

Authors:  Christian J Barton; Simon L Kappel; Peter Ahrendt; Ole Simonsen; Michael S Rathleff
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Consensus-based recommendations of Australian podiatrists for the prescription of foot orthoses for symptomatic flexible pes planus in adults.

Authors:  Helen A Banwell; Shylie Mackintosh; Dominic Thewlis; Karl B Landorf
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Foot posture as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bradley S Neal; Ian B Griffiths; Geoffrey J Dowling; George S Murley; Shannon E Munteanu; Melinda M Franettovich Smith; Natalie J Collins; Christian J Barton
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  Outcome predictors for conservative patellofemoral pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simon Lack; Christian Barton; Bill Vicenzino; Dylan Morrissey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Vitamin D and Stress Fractures in Sport: Preventive and Therapeutic Measures-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Beat Knechtle; Zbigniew Jastrzębski; Lee Hill; Pantelis T Nikolaidis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Foot orthoses for adults with flexible pes planus: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen A Banwell; Shylie Mackintosh; Dominic Thewlis
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.