Literature DB >> 9307899

Creating tobacco control policy at the local level: implementation of a direct action organizing approach.

T M Blaine1, J L Forster, D Hennrikus, S O'Neil, M Wolfson, H Pham.   

Abstract

This article describes the community activation and policy change process in seven Minnesota communities involved in the Tobacco Policy Options for Prevention (TPOP) study. The study's intervention employed a direct action organizing model, which relies on mobilizing large numbers of people to alter decision making and leverage the power of elites. As part of the organizing process, TPOP organizers and teams made 1,319 personal contacts with community members, generated 309 media stories, and initiated 445 public events related to tobacco use. These actions resulted in the establishment of comprehensive tobacco ordinances in all seven communities. The authors discuss the goals, training, activities and political factors relevant to four phases of the TPOP intervention: information gathering and team recruitment, community awareness building and ordinance development, preparing for city council, and ordinance establishment and enforcement. Included are suggestions for practitioners interested in using policy change and community-based advocacy to resolve public health problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9307899     DOI: 10.1177/109019819702400510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  9 in total

1.  Community organizing goes to college: a practice-based model to implement environmental strategies to reduce high-risk drinking on college campuses.

Authors:  Kimberly G Wagoner; Scott D Rhodes; Ashley W Lentz; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2010-06-08

2.  Youth tobacco access: adult attitudes, awareness, and perceived self-efficacy in two Arizona counties.

Authors:  Jason T Siegel; Eusebio M Alvaro
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-12

3.  Impact of a randomized campus/community trial to prevent high-risk drinking among college students.

Authors:  Mark Wolfson; Heather Champion; Thomas P McCoy; Scott D Rhodes; Edward H Ip; Jill N Blocker; Barbara Alvarez Martin; Kimberly G Wagoner; Mary Claire O'Brien; Erin L Sutfin; Ananda Mitra; Robert H Durant
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 4.  A systematic review of interventions for preventing tobacco sales to minors.

Authors:  L F Stead; T Lancaster
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  The effects of community policies to reduce youth access to tobacco.

Authors:  J L Forster; D M Murray; M Wolfson; T M Blaine; A C Wagenaar; D J Hennrikus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Strategies implemented by 20 local tobacco control agencies to promote smoke-free recreation areas, California, 2004-2007.

Authors:  Travis D Satterlund; Diana Cassady; Jeanette Treiber; Cathy Lemp
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Barriers to adopting and implementing local-level tobacco control policies.

Authors:  Travis D Satterlund; Diana Cassady; Jeanette Treiber; Cathy Lemp
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

8.  Evaluation of community and organizational characteristics of smoke-free ordinance campaigns in 15 Wisconsin cities.

Authors:  David Ahrens; Paul Uebelher; Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Instituting a smoke-free policy for city recreation centers and playgrounds, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2010.

Authors:  Raymond Leung; Giridhar Mallya; Lorraine T Dean; Amna Rizvi; Leo Dignam; Donald F Schwarz
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.830

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.