OBJECTIVE: To describe the sonographic appearance of normal anal sphincter anatomy and sphincter defects evaluated with a conventional 5 MHz convex transducer placed on the perineum. DESIGN: Prospective, single-blind study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, USA. POPULATION: Twenty-five women with symptoms of faecal incontinence, 11 asymptomatic nulliparous women, and 32 asymptomatic parous women. METHODS: A convex scanner was placed on the perineum with the woman in lithotomy position. Images were taken at three levels of the sphincter canal. Pictures were evaluated by two examiners who were blinded to the case history of the women and to the results of each other for the presence or absence of sphincter defects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Description of anal sphincter appearance on endoanal ultrasound. Reproducibility of the evaluation of sphincter defects. RESULTS: The internal anal sphincter is visible as a hypoechoic circle; the external anal sphincter shows a hyperechoic pattern. Proximally the sling of the puborectalis muscle is visible. Sphincter defects were detected in 20 women. In all five women who subsequently underwent surgery, the presence and location of the defect was confirmed at the time of surgery. Examiners were in agreement 100% of the time on the presence or absence of internal defects. They disagreed in one patient on the presence of an external defect. CONCLUSION: Exoanal ultrasound provides information on normal anatomy and on defects of the anal sphincter.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the sonographic appearance of normal anal sphincter anatomy and sphincter defects evaluated with a conventional 5 MHz convex transducer placed on the perineum. DESIGN: Prospective, single-blind study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, USA. POPULATION: Twenty-five women with symptoms of faecal incontinence, 11 asymptomatic nulliparous women, and 32 asymptomatic parous women. METHODS: A convex scanner was placed on the perineum with the woman in lithotomy position. Images were taken at three levels of the sphincter canal. Pictures were evaluated by two examiners who were blinded to the case history of the women and to the results of each other for the presence or absence of sphincter defects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Description of anal sphincter appearance on endoanal ultrasound. Reproducibility of the evaluation of sphincter defects. RESULTS: The internal anal sphincter is visible as a hypoechoic circle; the external anal sphincter shows a hyperechoic pattern. Proximally the sling of the puborectalis muscle is visible. Sphincter defects were detected in 20 women. In all five women who subsequently underwent surgery, the presence and location of the defect was confirmed at the time of surgery. Examiners were in agreement 100% of the time on the presence or absence of internal defects. They disagreed in one patient on the presence of an external defect. CONCLUSION: Exoanal ultrasound provides information on normal anatomy and on defects of the anal sphincter.
Authors: R Tunn; G Schaer; U Peschers; W Bader; A Gauruder; E Hanzal; H Koelbl; D Koelle; D Perucchini; E Petri; P Riss; B Schuessler; V Viereck Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2004-10-16
Authors: Ka Lai Shek; Vincent Della Zazzera; Ixora Kamisan Atan; Rodrigo Guzman Rojas; Susanne Langer; Hans Peter Dietz Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 2.894