Literature DB >> 9307348

Method of Medicare reimbursement and the rate of potentially ineffective care of critically ill patients.

D J Cher1, L A Lenert.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The worst outcome of critical care may not be death itself; rather, the worst may be an extended death process in which a patient's and his or her family's suffering has been prolonged by services that are ultimately impotent. We have previously used potentially ineffective care (PIC) as a proxy measure for this type of care.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if PIC is delivered less often to Medicare patients enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) than those in traditional fee-for-service health plans. PATIENTS: All Medicare patients hospitalized in intensive care units in California during fiscal year 1994. OUTCOME: Potentially ineffective care was defined as the concurrence of in-hospital death or death within 100 days of hospital discharge and resource use (total hospital costs) above the 90th percentile.
METHODS: Hospital costs were adjusted for institution-specific cost-to-charge ratios and local wage indices derived from Health Care Financing Administration cost reports. A multivariate regression model adjusted PIC rates for age, sex, race, elective admission to the hospital, Charlson index diseases, the 15 most common diagnosis related groups for death by 100 days, intensive care unit size, and number of residents at the hospital.
RESULTS: A total of 3914 (4.8%) of 81 494 patients experienced PIC and used 21.6% of total intensive care unit resources. The occurrence of PIC was less common among HMO members (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.87). However, HMO members were not more likely to experience in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.07) and only slightly more likely to experience death by 100 days after hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who experience PIC outcomes are not uncommon in the Medicare population, and patients experiencing this outcome consume a disproportionate amount of medical resources. Medicare beneficiaries in HMO practice settings had a lower risk of experiencing PIC outcomes after adjusting for age, sex, diagnosis, comorbid conditions, and characteristics of the treating hospital. This suggests that HMO practices may be better at limiting or avoiding injudicious use of critical care near the end of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9307348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  11 in total

1.  Intensive care unit use and mortality in the elderly.

Authors:  W Yu; A S Ash; N G Levinsky; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Physician-assisted suicide in the United States: the underlying factors in technology, health care and palliative medicine--Part one.

Authors:  R F Rizzo
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2000

3.  Development of inpatient risk stratification models of acute kidney injury for use in electronic health records.

Authors:  Michael E Matheny; Randolph A Miller; T Alp Ikizler; Lemuel R Waitman; Joshua C Denny; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Robert S Dittus; Josh F Peterson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  [End-of-life decisions and practices in critically ill patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. A nationwide survey].

Authors:  C Schimmer; K Hamouda; M Oezkur; S-P Sommer; M Leistner; R Leyh
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 5.  An official American Thoracic Society systematic review: the association between health insurance status and access, care delivery, and outcomes for patients who are critically ill.

Authors:  Robert A Fowler; Lori-Anne Noyahr; J Daryl Thornton; Ruxandra Pinto; Jeremy M Kahn; Neill K J Adhikari; Peter M Dodek; Nadia A Khan; Tom Kalb; Andrea Hill; James M O'Brien; David Evans; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Is survival better at hospitals with higher "end-of-life" treatment intensity?

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Chung-Chou H Chang; Max H Farrell; Judith R Lave; Mark S Roberts; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Overuse and systems of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Salomeh Keyhani; Raphael Falk; Elizabeth A Howell; Tara Bishop; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Gastroduodenal perfusion and mortality in mechanical ventilation-dependent patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Authors:  Mitchell J Spirt; Paul H Guth; Gayle Randall; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: can we simultaneously increase quality and reduce costs?

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg; Mark E Bensink; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Differences in one-year health outcomes and resource utilization by definition of prolonged mechanical ventilation: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher E Cox; Shannon S Carson; Jennifer H Lindquist; Maren K Olsen; Joseph A Govert; Lakshmipathi Chelluri
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.