OBJECTIVE: Patients with hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (AKI) are at risk for increased mortality and further medical complications. Evaluating these patients with a prediction tool easily implemented within an electronic health record (EHR) would identify high-risk patients prior to the development of AKI and could prevent iatrogenically induced episodes of AKI and improve clinical management. METHODS: The authors used structured clinical data acquired from an EHR to identify patients with normal kidney function for admissions from 1 August 1999 to 31 July 2003. Using administrative, computerized provider order entry and laboratory test data, they developed a 3-level risk stratification model to predict each of 2 severity levels of in-hospital AKI as defined by RIFLE criteria. The severity levels were defined as 150% or 200% of baseline serum creatinine. Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Cross-validation of the models resulted in area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves of 0.75 (150% elevation) and 0.78 (200% elevation). Both models were adequately calibrated as measured by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test chi-squared values of 9.7 (P = 0.29) and 12.7 (P = 0.12), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The authors generated risk prediction models for hospital-acquired AKI using only commonly available electronic data. The models identify patients at high risk for AKI who might benefit from early intervention or increased monitoring.
OBJECTIVE:Patients with hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (AKI) are at risk for increased mortality and further medical complications. Evaluating these patients with a prediction tool easily implemented within an electronic health record (EHR) would identify high-risk patients prior to the development of AKI and could prevent iatrogenically induced episodes of AKI and improve clinical management. METHODS: The authors used structured clinical data acquired from an EHR to identify patients with normal kidney function for admissions from 1 August 1999 to 31 July 2003. Using administrative, computerized provider order entry and laboratory test data, they developed a 3-level risk stratification model to predict each of 2 severity levels of in-hospital AKI as defined by RIFLE criteria. The severity levels were defined as 150% or 200% of baseline serum creatinine. Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Cross-validation of the models resulted in area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves of 0.75 (150% elevation) and 0.78 (200% elevation). Both models were adequately calibrated as measured by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test chi-squared values of 9.7 (P = 0.29) and 12.7 (P = 0.12), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The authors generated risk prediction models for hospital-acquired AKI using only commonly available electronic data. The models identify patients at high risk for AKI who might benefit from early intervention or increased monitoring.
Authors: Peter A McCullough; Andy Adam; Christoph R Becker; Charles Davidson; Norbert Lameire; Fulvio Stacul; James Tumlin Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-02-23 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Ying Huang; Gary Longton; Ross Prentice; Ian M Thompson; Yingye Zheng Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-11-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: T J Walsh; J W Hiemenz; N L Seibel; J R Perfect; G Horwith; L Lee; J L Silber; M J DiNubile; A Reboli; E Bow; J Lister; E J Anaissie Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: E S Kirkendall; W L Spires; T A Mottes; J K Schaffzin; C Barclay; S L Goldstein Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Sharon E Davis; Robert A Greevy; Christopher Fonnesbeck; Thomas A Lasko; Colin G Walsh; Michael E Matheny Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sami Safadi; Musab S Hommos; Felicity T Enders; John C Lieske; Kianoush B Kashani Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Benjamin A Goldstein; Michael J Pencina; Maria E Montez-Rath; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Benjamin A Goldstein; Ann Marie Navar; Michael J Pencina; John P A Ioannidis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Robert M Cronin; Jacob P VanHouten; Edward D Siew; Svetlana K Eden; Stephan D Fihn; Christopher D Nielson; Josh F Peterson; Clifton R Baker; T Alp Ikizler; Theodore Speroff; Michael E Matheny Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 4.497