Literature DB >> 9306478

Impact of a false positive blood culture result on the management of febrile children.

L C Thuler1, M Jenicek, J P Turgeon, M Rivard, P Lebel, M H Lebel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a preliminary positive blood culture result, subsequently confirmed to be a false positive blood culture result on rate of hospitalization, antibiotic therapy and use of microbiologic tests.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children between 1 month and 18 years old on whom a blood culture was performed were eligible, excluding those with an underlying condition for whom a false positive blood culture may be difficult to assess. During the 1-year study period 9959 blood cultures were performed of which 778 (7.8%) produced growth. Charts of 81 patients with a false positive blood culture were reviewed and compared with those of 162 patients with a true negative blood culture. Patients already hospitalized when blood culture was drawn (n = 24) were analyzed separately from those who were not (n = 219). Among these, patients were divided into those who were followed as outpatients (n = 104) and hospitalized (n = 115).
RESULTS: Both groups (false positive vs. true negative) were comparable for age, sex, temperature at consultation, white blood cell count and illness severity. Twenty-six percent of patients followed as outpatients who had a false positive blood culture were hospitalized because of a preliminary positive blood culture result. Among patients hospitalized at the initial assessment, the frequency of antibiotic therapy (91% vs. 71%, P < 0.01), the frequency of use of intravenous antibiotics (80% vs. 58%, P < 0.01) and the percentage of unwarranted antibiotic prescription (13% vs. 0%, P < 0.01) were significantly greater in the false positive group than in the true negative group. The same results were found for each of these outcomes among the group of patients followed as outpatients (61% vs. 28%, P < 0.01, 17% vs. 0%, P < 0.01 and 39% vs. 0%, P < 0.01) for false positive vs. true negative, respectively. Patients with false positive blood cultures had more blood cultures drawn subsequently (P < 0.01). Children already hospitalized when the blood culture was obtained did not show significant differences in main outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: False positive blood culture results generate unnecessary hospitalizations, antibiotic therapy and use of microbiologic tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9306478     DOI: 10.1097/00006454-199709000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J        ISSN: 0891-3668            Impact factor:   2.129


  17 in total

Review 1.  Unexplained fever in young children: how to manage severe bacterial infection.

Authors:  Itzhak Brook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-08

2.  Repeat blood cultures in children with persistent fever and neutropenia: Diagnostic and clinical implications.

Authors:  Rachel L Wattier; Christopher C Dvorak; Andrew D Auerbach; Peggy S Weintrub
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 3.  Updated review of blood culture contamination.

Authors:  Keri K Hall; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Blood cultures in the emergency department evaluation of childhood pneumonia.

Authors:  Samir S Shah; Maria H Dugan; Louis M Bell; Robert W Grundmeier; Todd A Florin; Elizabeth M Hines; Joshua P Metlay
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Blood Culture Contaminants in a Paediatric Population Retrospective study from a tertiary hospital in Oman.

Authors:  Mohamed A El-Naggari; Sharef W Al-Mulaabed; Zakaria Al-Muharrmi; Renjith Mani; Rana Abdelrahim; Reem Abdwani
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2017-06-20

Review 6.  Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan R Snyder; Alessandra M Favoretto; Rich Ann Baetz; James H Derzon; Bereneice M Madison; Diana Mass; Colleen S Shaw; Christopher D Layfield; Robert H Christenson; Edward B Liebow
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 7.  Emerging Technologies for Molecular Diagnosis of Sepsis.

Authors:  Mridu Sinha; Julietta Jupe; Hannah Mack; Todd P Coleman; Shelley M Lawrence; Stephanie I Fraley
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Impact of blood cultures drawn by phlebotomy on contamination rates and health care costs in a hospital emergency department.

Authors:  Rita M Gander; Linda Byrd; Michael DeCrescenzo; Shaina Hirany; Michelle Bowen; Judy Baughman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Approach to the febrile child: A challenge bridging the gap between the literature and clinical practice.

Authors:  Jean-Bernard Girodias; Benoit Bailey
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Clinical Impact and Provider Acceptability of Real-Time Antimicrobial Stewardship Decision Support for Rapid Diagnostics in Children With Positive Blood Culture Results.

Authors:  Kevin Messacar; Amanda L Hurst; Jason Child; Kristen Campbell; Claire Palmer; Stacey Hamilton; Elaine Dowell; Christine C Robinson; Sarah K Parker; Samuel R Dominguez
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.