Literature DB >> 9306396

A model protocol to assess the risks of agricultural introductions.

J Barton1, J Crandon, D Kennedy, H Miller.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9306396     DOI: 10.1038/nbt0997-845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Safety, risk and the precautionary principle: rethinking precautionary approaches to the regulation of transgenic plants.

Authors:  Gregory Conko
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  The meaningless pseudo-category of "GMOs": The trouble with the "new techniques" for genetically modifying crops demonstrates the illogical process-based definition of GMOs in EU regulation.

Authors:  Giovanni Tagliabue
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  The EU legislation on "GMOs" between nonsense and protectionism: An ongoing Schumpeterian chain of public choices.

Authors:  Giovanni Tagliabue
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms.

Authors:  Gregory Conko; Drew L Kershen; Henry Miller; Wayne A Parrott
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Editing EU legislation to fit plant genome editing: The use of genome editing technologies in plant breeding requires a novel regulatory approach for new plant varieties that involves farmers.

Authors:  Agnes E Ricroch; Klaus Ammann; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Recovering the Original Intentions of Risk Assessment and Management of Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union.

Authors:  Dennis Eriksson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-04

7.  The evolving EU regulatory framework for precision breeding.

Authors:  Dennis Eriksson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts.

Authors:  Thorben Sprink; Dennis Eriksson; Joachim Schiemann; Frank Hartung
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.570

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.