Literature DB >> 9304767

Meta-analysis for the evaluation of potential surrogate markers.

M J Daniels1, M D Hughes.   

Abstract

We describe a meta-analysis approach for the evaluation of a potential surrogate marker. Surrogate markers are useful in helping to identify therapeutic mechanisms of action and disease pathogenesis, and for selecting therapies to take forward from phase II to phase III clinical trials. They have also become increasingly important for regulatory purposes by providing a basis for preliminary approval of drugs pending clinical outcome studies. Methodology for evaluating surrogate markers has focused on determining the difference in the effects of two treatments on clinical outcome in an individual clinical trial, and then estimating the proportion of this difference explained by the treatment's effects on the potential marker. Studies are, however, frequently underpowered or cease before they accumulate sufficient evidence to draw strong conclusions about the value of a potential surrogate marker using this approach, and there are also some technical difficulties with the approach. Consideration of the association between the difference in treatment effects on the clinical outcome and the difference in treatment effects on the potential marker over a range of trials provides an alternative means to evaluate a potential marker. We describe a meta-analysis approach using Bayesian methods to model this association. Importantly, this approach enables one to obtain prediction intervals for the true difference in clinical outcome for a given estimated treatment difference in the effect on the potential marker. We illustrate the methodology by applying it to results from studies of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group to assess the value of CD4 T-lymphocyte cell count as a potential surrogate marker for the treatment effects on the development of AIDS or death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9304767     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970915)16:17<1965::aid-sim630>3.0.co;2-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  68 in total

Review 1.  Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Sterne; M Egger; G D Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-14

Review 2.  MRI monitoring of immunomodulation in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis trials.

Authors:  Frederik Barkhof; Jack H Simon; Franz Fazekas; Marco Rovaris; Ludwig Kappos; Nicola de Stefano; Chris H Polman; John Petkau; Ernst W Radue; Maria P Sormani; David K Li; Paul O'Connor; Xavier Montalban; David H Miller; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Comparing biomarkers as principal surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Is blood pressure reduction a valid surrogate endpoint for stroke prevention? An analysis incorporating a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, a by-trial weighted errors-in-variables regression, the surrogate threshold effect (STE) and the Biomarker-Surrogacy (BioSurrogate) Evaluation Schema (BSES).

Authors:  Marissa N Lassere; Kent R Johnson; Michal Schiff; David Rees
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Commentary on "Principal stratification - a goal or a tool?" by Judea Pearl.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Michael G Hudgens; Julian Wolfson
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Principal stratification and attribution prohibition: good ideas taken too far.

Authors:  Marshall Joffe
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  A unified procedure for meta-analytic evaluation of surrogate end points in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  James Y Dai; James P Hughes
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Predicting treatment effect from surrogate endpoints and historical trials: an extrapolation involving probabilities of a binary outcome or survival to a specific time.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Daniel J Sargent; Marc Buyse; Tomasz Burzykowski
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Surrogate end points in pulmonary arterial hypertension: assessing the response to therapy.

Authors:  Jennifer L Snow; Steven M Kawut
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.878

10.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.