Literature DB >> 9303464

Feeding resistant starch affects fecal and cecal microflora and short-chain fatty acids in rats.

B Kleessen1, G Stoof, J Proll, D Schmiedl, J Noack, M Blaut.   

Abstract

The effects of different forms of resistant potato starch (RS) on the major microbial population groups and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in the cecum and feces of rats were studied over a 5-mo feeding period. Thirty 8-wk-old male Wistar rats, averaging 210 g initial body weight, were adapted for 7 d to a balanced basal diet containing 60% waxy maize starch devoid of any RS. On d 8, three groups of 10 rats each were fed diets containing the following forms of starch: 1) rapidly digestible waxy maize starch (basal diet), 2) a mixture of 83.3% waxy maize starch and 16.7% native granular potato starch (RS 1), or 3) a mixture of 33.3% waxy maize starch and 66.7% modified potato starch (RS 2). The final RS content in RS 1 and RS 2 was 10%. Fecal samples were collected at d 8 and 1, 3, and 5 mo after the start of the experiment. Cecal contents were taken after 5 mo. The colony counts of microbial groups did not vary with time in the control or the RS 1 group (P > .05). Only the number of Bacteroides/fusobacteria decreased between mo 1 and 5 in rats fed RS 1 (P < .05). The RS 2 diet led to a significant increase in total culturable bacteria, lactobacilli, streptococci, and enterobacteria between mo 1 and 5. The RS 1 and RS 2 diets stimulated the growth of bifidobacteria. Cecal numbers of lactobacilli, streptococci, and enterobacteria were higher in rats fed RS 2 than in rats fed RS 1 or control diet (P < .05). Lactobacillus cellobiosus occurred only in rats fed RS 1 or RS 2. Acetate increased in mo 3 compared with d 8 in all groups (P < .05). The fecal and cecal SCFA displayed higher concentrations of acetate and propionate and a higher molar proportion of propionate in RS 2 than in RS 1 or control rats (P < .05). Stimulation of bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and SCFA may be useful for the suppression of pathogenic organisms in the colon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9303464     DOI: 10.2527/1997.7592453x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  22 in total

1.  Immobilization of infant fecal microbiota and utilization in an in vitro colonic fermentation model.

Authors:  C Cinquin; G Le Blay; I Fliss; C Lacroix
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Effects of dietary zinc levels, phytic acid and resistant starch on zinc bioavailability in rats.

Authors:  Lina Yonekura; Hiroo Suzuki
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 3.  A possible link between Crohn's disease and ankylosing spondylitis via Klebsiella infections.

Authors:  Alan Ebringer; Taha Rashid; Harmale Tiwana; Clyde Wilson
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Trial data of the anti-obesity potential of a high resistant starch diet for canines using Dodamssal rice and the identification of discriminating markers in feces for metabolic profiling.

Authors:  Ye Jin Kim; Jae Geun Kim; Wan-Kyu Lee; Kyoung Min So; Jae Kwang Kim
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 5.  Complementary and Alternative Medicine Strategies for Therapeutic Gut Microbiota Modulation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and their Next-Generation Approaches.

Authors:  Abigail R Basson; Minh Lam; Fabio Cominelli
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Adhesion of bifidobacteria to granular starch and its implications in probiotic technologies.

Authors:  R Crittenden; A Laitila; P Forssell; J Mättö; M Saarela; T Mattila-Sandholm; P Myllärinen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Conserved and variable responses of the gut microbiome to resistant starch type 2.

Authors:  Zachary A Bendiks; Knud E B Knudsen; Michael J Keenan; Maria L Marco
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet Supplemented with Resistant Starch Display Marked Shifts in the Liver Metabolome Concurrent with Altered Gut Bacteria.

Authors:  Dorothy A Kieffer; Brian D Piccolo; Maria L Marco; Eun Bae Kim; Michael L Goodson; Michael J Keenan; Tamara N Dunn; Knud Erik Bach Knudsen; Roy J Martin; Sean H Adams
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects.

Authors:  Inés Martínez; Jaehyoung Kim; Patrick R Duffy; Vicki L Schlegel; Jens Walter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dietary resistant starch upregulates total GLP-1 and PYY in a sustained day-long manner through fermentation in rodents.

Authors:  June Zhou; Roy J Martin; Richard T Tulley; Anne M Raggio; Kathleen L McCutcheon; Li Shen; Samuel Colby Danna; Sasmita Tripathy; Maren Hegsted; Michael J Keenan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.