Literature DB >> 9303255

Assessment of postoperative pain management: patient satisfaction and perceived helpfulness.

R N Jamison1, M J Ross, P Hoopman, F Griffin, J Levy, M Daly, J L Schaffer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Increasing attention has been given to the assessment of patient satisfaction as a way to monitor quality of care in hospital settings. Postoperative patient satisfaction has been thought to be related to level of pain intensity, expectations of outcome, perceived concern by the staff, and helpfulness of treatments. The aim of this study is to develop a simple, reliable measure to assess pain and satisfaction in postsurgical patients and to examine factors related to patient satisfaction.
DESIGN: A satisfaction questionnaire was developed for this study and administered to 119 patients who had undergone a major orthopedic surgical procedure. The majority of the patients were diagnosed with osteoarthritis and reported moderate to severe preoperative pain. The 13-item measure was found to be reliable (test-retest r = .86; interexaminer r = .98), valid (exploratory factor analyses; intercorrelations), and easy to administer.
RESULTS: Results showed that the majority of the patients were satisfied with their care (91%), postoperative pain intensity (94%), and the way they were treated by the physicians and nurses (98%). Patients with low postoperative pain ratings who perceived that the physicians and nurses showed concern with how much pain they were feeling reported greatest satisfaction with their care (p < .001). In general, lower postoperative pain ratings were the best predictors of satisfaction and helpfulness of treatment. Preoperative pain status, expected level of postoperative pain, and time waiting for pain medication after a request was made were not significantly correlated with ratings of postoperative pain or satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the important influence of adequate treatment of postoperative pain and perceived concern by the hospital staff on patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9303255     DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199709000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  21 in total

1.  Validation of the surgical pain scales in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Nancy Janz; Kim Kenton; Yvonne Hsu; W Jerod Greer; Keisha Dyer; Amanda White; Susan Meikle; Wen Ye
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  [Patient- and hospital-related determinants of satisfaction with hospital stay of severely injured patients].

Authors:  O Ommen; C Janssen; E Neugebauer; K Rehm; B Boullion; B Bouillon; H Pfaff
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Postoperative pain relief is an important factor for the patients' selection of a clinic. Results of an anonymous survey].

Authors:  C Simanski; R Lefering; T Paffrath; P Riess; N Yücel; M Maegele; C Thüsing; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  A randomized study comparing three groups of vein harvesting methods for coronary artery bypass grafting: endoscopic harvest versus standard bridging and open techniques.

Authors:  Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy; William R Critchley; Alex T Glover; Janesh Nair; Mark T Jones; Paul D Waterworth; James E Fildes; Nizar Yonan
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-18

5.  Continuous femoral nerve block using 0.125% bupivacaine does not prevent early ambulation after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael J Beebe; Rachel Allen; Mike B Anderson; Jeffrey D Swenson; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Interest in Anesthesia as Reflected by Keyword Searches using Common Search Engines.

Authors:  Renyu Liu; Paul S García; Lee A Fleisher
Journal:  J Anesth Clin Res       Date:  2012-01-23

7.  How to improve satisfaction with hospital stay of severely injured patients.

Authors:  C Janssen; O Ommen; E Neugebauer; R Lefering; H Pfaff
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Patient-reported quality of pain treatment and use of interpreters in spanish-speaking patients hospitalized for obstetric and gynecological care.

Authors:  Nathalia Jimenez; Gerardo Moreno; Mei Leng; Dedra Buchwald; Leo S Morales
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Satisfied or not satisfied: pain experiences of patients with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Miriam O Ezenwa; Robert E Molokie; Zaijie Jim Wang; Marie L Suarez; Yingwei Yao; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  Assessment of intraoperative pain during Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS): An opportunity for improved patient care.

Authors:  Karen L Connolly; Kishwer S Nehal; Stephen W Dusza; Anthony M Rossi; Erica H Lee
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 11.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.