Literature DB >> 16897026

[Patient- and hospital-related determinants of satisfaction with hospital stay of severely injured patients].

O Ommen1, C Janssen, E Neugebauer, K Rehm, B Boullion, B Bouillon, H Pfaff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General political and legal changes in the German health care system will increase the importance of patient surveys. Patient satisfaction with medical and organizational care during their stay in a hospital is a relevant outcome of quality assurance. Satisfied patients also show a higher compliance with treatment and therefore increase the probability of a successful outcome. The objective of this analysis was to identify determinants of satisfaction with hospital stay of severely injured patients.
METHODS: A written questionnaire was sent to 121 severely injured patients, who were predominantly hurt by traffic or work-related accidents and were treated between 1996 and 2001 in two hospitals in Cologne (response rate=74.4%, n=90). The questionnaire used in this study contained questions about psychosocial care of physicians and nurses in and organizational and structural characteristics of the hospital.
RESULTS: Logistic regressions identified two significant predictors for satisfaction with hospital stay: (1) subjective evaluation of psychosocial quality of care by physicians and (2) patients' perception of active integration in treatment decisions.
CONCLUSION: The results of this analysis confirm the importance of soft science in medical education also for surgeons. Medical education should integrate knowledge about psychosocial aspects of medicine. The quality of psychosocial care of physicians seems to be a predictor of patient satisfaction. The probability of dissatisfaction increases with deficits in communication, information, and time as well as no active integration in treatment. The results of this analysis confirm the vital importance of psychosocial aspects in physician-patient interactions with severely injured patients for satisfaction with stay in hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897026     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1091-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  61 in total

1.  Relationships between physician practice style, patient satisfaction, and attributes of primary care.

Authors:  Susan A Flocke; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Assessment of postoperative pain management: patient satisfaction and perceived helpfulness.

Authors:  R N Jamison; M J Ross; P Hoopman; F Griffin; J Levy; M Daly; J L Schaffer
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 3.  Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence.

Authors:  A G Thompson; R Suñol
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  [Let us Ask the Consumer].

Authors:  Karin Siegrist; Peter Schlebusch; Ulrich Trenckmann
Journal:  Psychiatr Prax       Date:  2002-05

5.  [Patient satisfaction-subjective quality assessment by patients and success factor for clinics].

Authors:  H Olandt; H Krentz
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  1998-12

6.  Impact of the physician's participatory style in asthma outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  R J Adams; B J Smith; R E Ruffin
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.347

7.  Satisfaction, gender, and communication in medical visits.

Authors:  J A Hall; J T Irish; D L Roter; C M Ehrlich; L H Miller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?

Authors:  B Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care.

Authors:  C E Lerman; D S Brody; G C Caputo; D G Smith; C G Lazaro; H G Wolfson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Patient satisfaction: can patients evaluate the quality of health care?

Authors:  D M Mirvis
Journal:  Tenn Med       Date:  1998-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Sequelae of severe injuries : consequences for trauma rehabilitation].

Authors:  S Simmel; V Bühren
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  [Surviving multiple trauma--what comes next? The rehabilitation of seriously injured patients].

Authors:  S Simmel; V Bühren
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.000

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.