Literature DB >> 9302242

A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders.

K A Kobak1, L H Taylor, S L Dottl, J H Greist, J W Jefferson, D Burroughs, J M Mantle, D J Katzelnick, R Norton, H J Henk, R C Serlin.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Common mental disorders are often not identified in primary care settings.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and clinical utility of a telephone-assisted computer-administered version of Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD), a brief questionnaire and interview instrument designed to identify psychiatric disorders in primary care patients.
DESIGN: Comparison of diagnoses obtained by computer over the telephone using interactive voice response (IVR) technology vs those obtained by a trained clinician over the telephone using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition] Diagnosis (SCID). A subsample also received the clinician-administered version of PRIME-MD. PATIENTS: Outpatients (N=200) from 4 primary care clinics, an eating disorders clinic, an alcohol treatment facility, psychiatric outpatients, and community controls.
SETTING: Interviews conducted by telephone, except for face-to-face administration of PRIME-MD, which was conducted at either the primary care clinic or a research clinic.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Prevalence rates for any psychiatric disorder were similar between diagnoses made by the computer and those made by a mental health professional using the SCID (60.0% vs 58.5%). Prevalence rates for individual diagnoses were generally similar across versions. However, primary care patients reported twice as much alcohol abuse on the computer (15.0%) as on either the SCID (7.5%) or the clinician-administered PRIME-MD (7.5%). Using the SCID as the criterion, both the computer- and clinician-administered versions of PRIME-MD demonstrated high and roughly equivalent levels of sensitivity and specificity. Overall agreement (K) for any diagnosis was 0.67 for the computer-administered PRIME-MD and 0.70 for the clinician-administered PRIME-MD.
CONCLUSIONS: The computer-administered PRIME-MD appears to be a valid instrument for assessing psychopathology in primary care patients. Interactive voice response technology allows for increased availability, and provides primary care physicians with information that will increase the quality of patient care without additional physician time and at minimal expense.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9302242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  40 in total

1.  Telephone medicine for internists.

Authors:  D M Elnicki; P Ogden; M Flannery; M Hannis; S Cykert
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Impact of T-ACASI on Survey Measurements of Subjective Phenomena.

Authors:  Thomas Harmon; Charles F Turner; Susan M Rogers; Elizabeth Eggleston; Anthony M Roman; Maria A Villarroel; James R Chromy; Laxminarayana Ganapathi; Sheping Li
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2009-05-28

3.  One holy grail: evidence- and measurement-based practice.

Authors:  John Greist
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2006-12

4.  Time to response in generalized anxiety disorder in a naturalistic setting: combination therapy with alprazolam orally disintegrating tablets and serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared to serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone.

Authors:  Mark Hyman Rapaport; Steve B Skarky; David J Katzelnick; Jeffrey N Dewester; James M Harper; Kay E McCrary
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2006-12

5.  Time to response in panic disorder in a naturalistic setting: combination therapy with alprazolam orally disintegrating tablets and serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared to serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone.

Authors:  David J Katzelnick; Johnaqa Saidi; Mark R Vanelli; James W Jefferson; James M Harper; Kay E McCrary
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2006-12

Review 6.  Pragmatic characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Patrick O Monahan; Jacob Kean
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Remission with venlafaxine extended release or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depressed patients: a randomized, open-label study.

Authors:  Michael E Thase; Philip T Ninan; Jeff J Musgnung; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2011

8.  Medical versus nonmedical mental health referral: clinical decision-making by telephone access center staff.

Authors:  Myron L Pulier; Donald S Ciccone; Cherie Castellano; Karen Marcus; Steven J Schleifer
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

9.  Engagement with automated patient monitoring and self-management support calls: experience with a thousand chronically ill patients.

Authors:  John D Piette; Ann-Marie Rosland; Nicolle S Marinec; Dana Striplin; Steven J Bernstein; Maria J Silveira
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Marijuana use and intoxication among daily users: an intensive longitudinal study.

Authors:  John R Hughes; James R Fingar; Alan J Budney; Shelly Naud; John E Helzer; Peter W Callas
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.