BACKGROUND: Patient self-care support via Interactive Voice Response (IVR) can improve disease management. However, little is known about the factors affecting program engagement. METHODS: We compiled data on IVR program engagement for 1173 patients with: heart failure, depression, diabetes, or cancer who were followed for 28,962 person-weeks. Patients in programs for diabetes or depression (N=727) had the option of participating along with an informal caregiver who received electronic feedback based on the patient's IVR assessments. Analyses focused on factors associated with completing weekly IVR calls. RESULTS: Patients were on average 61 years old, 37% had at most a high school education, and 48% reported incomes of ≤$30,000. Among patients given the option of participating with an informal caregiver, 65% chose to do so. Patients completed 83% of attempted IVR assessments, with rates higher for heart failure (90%) and cancer programs (90%) than for the diabetes (81%) or depression programs (71%) (P<0.001). Among patients in diabetes or depression programs, those opting to have feedback provided to an informal caregiver were more likely to complete assessments [adjusted odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.77]. Older patients had higher call completion rates, even among patients aged 75 years and older. Missed clinic appointments, prior hospitalizations, depression program participation, and poorer mental health were associated with lower completion rates. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a variety of chronic conditions will complete IVR self-care support calls regularly. Risk factors for missed IVR calls overlap with those for missed appointments. Involvement of informal caregivers may significantly increase engagement.
BACKGROUND:Patient self-care support via Interactive Voice Response (IVR) can improve disease management. However, little is known about the factors affecting program engagement. METHODS: We compiled data on IVR program engagement for 1173 patients with: heart failure, depression, diabetes, or cancer who were followed for 28,962 person-weeks. Patients in programs for diabetes or depression (N=727) had the option of participating along with an informal caregiver who received electronic feedback based on the patient's IVR assessments. Analyses focused on factors associated with completing weekly IVR calls. RESULTS:Patients were on average 61 years old, 37% had at most a high school education, and 48% reported incomes of ≤$30,000. Among patients given the option of participating with an informal caregiver, 65% chose to do so. Patients completed 83% of attempted IVR assessments, with rates higher for heart failure (90%) and cancer programs (90%) than for the diabetes (81%) or depression programs (71%) (P<0.001). Among patients in diabetes or depression programs, those opting to have feedback provided to an informal caregiver were more likely to complete assessments [adjusted odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.77]. Older patients had higher call completion rates, even among patients aged 75 years and older. Missed clinic appointments, prior hospitalizations, depression program participation, and poorer mental health were associated with lower completion rates. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with a variety of chronic conditions will complete IVR self-care support calls regularly. Risk factors for missed IVR calls overlap with those for missed appointments. Involvement of informal caregivers may significantly increase engagement.
Authors: Benjamin B Brodey; Craig S Rosen; Inger S Brodey; Breanne M Sheetz; Robert R Steinfeld; David R Gastfriend Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2004-06
Authors: Jürgen Unützer; Wayne Katon; Christopher M Callahan; John W Williams; Enid Hunkeler; Linda Harpole; Marc Hoffing; Richard D Della Penna; Polly Hitchcock Noël; Elizabeth H B Lin; Patricia A Areán; Mark T Hegel; Lingqi Tang; Thomas R Belin; Sabine Oishi; Christopher Langston Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: E Aharonovich; M L Hatzenbuehler; B Johnston; A O'Leary; J Morgenstern; M L Wainberg; P Yao; J E Helzer; D S Hasin Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2006-08
Authors: Andrew J Karter; Melissa M Parker; Howard H Moffet; Ameena T Ahmed; Assiamira Ferrara; Jennifer Y Liu; Joe V Selby Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: April W Armstrong; Alice J Watson; Maryanne Makredes; Jason E Frangos; Alexandra B Kimball; Joseph C Kvedar Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2009-11
Authors: Lesli E Skolarus; John D Piette; Paul N Pfeiffer; Linda S Williams; Jason Mackey; Rebecca Hughes; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Nancy A Rigotti; Yuchiao Chang; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Sandra J Japuntich; Elyse R Park; Hilary A Tindle; Douglas E Levy; Zachary Z Reid; Joanna Streck; Timothy Gomperts; Jennifer H K Kelley; Daniel E Singer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Alan R Teo; Heather E Marsh; Sarah S Ono; Christina Nicolaidis; Somnath Saha; Steven K Dobscha Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ted A Skolarus; Tabitha Metreger; Daniela Wittmann; Soohyun Hwang; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Robert L Grubb; Jeffrey R Gingrich; Hui Zhu; John D Piette; Sarah T Hawley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John D Piette; Nicolle Marinec; Kathryn Janda; Emily Morgan; Karolina Schantz; Amparo Clara Aruquipa Yujra; Bismarck Pinto; José Marecelo Huayta Soto; Mary Janevic; James E Aikens Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 3.536