Literature DB >> 9299961

Monitoring of hemostasis in cardiac surgical patients: impact of point-of-care testing on blood loss and transfusion outcomes.

G J Despotis1, J H Joist, L T Goodnough.   

Abstract

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are at increased risk for excessive perioperative blood loss requiring transfusion of blood products. Strategies to optimize administration of heparin and protamine and the assessment of their effects on coagulation are evolving in cardiac surgical patients. Two recent evaluations have focused on the use of multiple point-of-care (POC) coagulation assays for patient-specific adjustment of heparin and protamine dosage. These studies indicate that blood loss and transfusion requirements in cardiac surgical patients may be reduced with more accurate control of heparin anticoagulation and its reversal. Blood component administration in patients with excessive post-CPB bleeding is generally empiric in part, related to turnaround times of laboratory-based tests. Methods are now available for rapid, POC assessment of coagulation to allow appropriate, targeted therapy for acquired hemostatic abnormalities. Recent studies indicate that a rapid evaluation of thrombocytopenia and coagulation factor deficiencies with POC tests can facilitate the optimal administration of pharmacologic and transfusion-based therapy in patients who exhibit excessive bleeding after CPB. POC tests that assess platelet function have been developed, and their use may facilitate identification of which patients at risk for excessive blood loss may respond to pharmacologic interventions such as desmopressin acetate or antifibrinolytic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9299961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  9 in total

Review 1.  Point of care testing.

Authors:  C P Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

2.  Getting it right: optimizing transfusion management during the procedure.

Authors:  Darryl McMillan; Kieran Potger; Joanne Southwell; Mark Ambrose; Terry Connolly; Margaret Louis
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-12

3.  Impact of platelet count on results obtained from multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (Multiplate).

Authors:  A A Hanke; K Roberg; E Monaca; T Sellmann; C F Weber; N Rahe-Meyer; K Görlinger
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.175

4.  Polyion selective polymeric membrane-based pulstrode as a detector in flow-injection analysis.

Authors:  Andrea K Bell-Vlasov; Joanna Zajda; Ayman Eldourghamy; Elzbieta Malinowska; Mark E Meyerhoff
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Coagulation testing in the perioperative period.

Authors:  Venkatesan Thiruvenkatarajan; Ashlee Pruett; Sanjib Das Adhikary
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-09

Review 6.  Measurement of non-VKA oral anticoagulants versus classic ones: the appropriate use of hemostasis assays.

Authors:  Jonathan Douxfils; Anne Tamigniau; Bernard Chatelain; Catherine Goffinet; Jean-Michel Dogné; François Mullier
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2014-11-04

7.  Point-of-Care Testing of Hemostasis in Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Domenico Prisco; Rita Paniccia
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2003-05-06

8.  Comparison of Coagulation Parameters in Arterial and Venous Blood in Cardiac Surgery Measured Using the Quantra System.

Authors:  Danja S Groves; Deborah A Winegar; Lucas G Fernandez; Julie L Huffmyer; Francesco Viola
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Blood management: transfusion medicine comes of age.

Authors:  Lawrence T Goodnough
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.