Literature DB >> 9298703

The crystal and molecular structures of cellulose I and II.

L M Kroon-Batenburg1, J Kroon.   

Abstract

The paper describes molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on the crystal structures of the Ibeta and II phases of cellulose. Structural proposals for each of these were made in the 1970s on the basis of X-ray diffraction data. However, due to the limited resolution of these data some controversies remained and details on hydrogen bonding could not be directly obtained. In contrast to structure factor amplitudes in X-ray diffraction, energies, as obtained from MD simulations, are very sensitive to the positions of the hydroxyl hydrogen atoms. Therefore the latter technique is very suitable for obtaining such structural details. MD simulations of the Ibeta phase clearly shows preference for one of the two possible models in which the chains are packed in a parallel orientation. Only the parallel-down mode (in the definition of Gardner and Blackwell (1974) J Biopolym 13: 1975-2001) presents a stable structure. The hydrogen bonding consists of two intramolecular hydrogen bonds parallel to the glycosidic linkage for both chains, and two intralayer hydrogen bonds. The layers are packed hydrophobically. All hydroxymethyl group are positioned in the tg conformation. For the cellulose II form it was found that, in contrast to what seemed to emerge from the X-ray fibre diffraction data, both independent chains had the gt conformation. This idea already existed because of elastic moduli calculations and 13C-solid state NMR data. Recently, the structure of cellotetraose was determined. There appear to be a striking similarity between the structure obtained from the MD simulations and this cellotetraose structure in terms of packing of the two independent molecules, the hydrogen bonding network and the conformations of the hydroxymethyl group, which were also gt for both molecules. The structure forms a 3D hydrogen bonded network, and the contribution from electrostatics to the packing is more pronounced than in case of the Ibeta structure. In contrast to what is expected, in view of the irreversible transition of the cellulose I to II form, the energies of the Ibeta form is found to be lower than that of II by 1 kcal mol(-1) per cellobiose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9298703     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018509231331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glycoconj J        ISSN: 0282-0080            Impact factor:   2.916


  6 in total

1.  Determination of the structure of cellulose II.

Authors:  F J Kolpak; J Blackwell
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.985

2.  Miniature crystal models of cellulose polymorphs and other carbohydrates.

Authors:  A D French; D P Miller; A Aabloo
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.953

3.  Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms.

Authors:  R H Atalla; D L Vanderhart
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Crystal structure of beta-D-cellotetraose hemihydrate with implications for the structure of cellulose II.

Authors:  K Gessler; N Krauss; T Steiner; C Betzel; C Sandmann; W Saenger
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A molecular dynamics simulation of crystalline alpha-cyclodextrin hexahydrate.

Authors:  J E Koehler; W Saenger; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Calcofluor white ST Alters the in vivo assembly of cellulose microfibrils.

Authors:  C H Haigler; R M Brown; M Benziman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd; Paul J Weimer; Willem H van Zyl; Isak S Pretorius
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 2.  Structural analysis of glucans.

Authors:  Andriy Synytsya; Miroslav Novak
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2014-02

Review 3.  Biomedical Applications of Bacterial Exopolysaccharides: A Review.

Authors:  Masrina Mohd Nadzir; Retno Wahyu Nurhayati; Farhana Nazira Idris; Minh Hong Nguyen
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 4.  Hemp and Its Derivatives as a Universal Industrial Raw Material (with Particular Emphasis on the Polymer Industry)-A Review.

Authors:  Karol Tutek; Anna Masek
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Establishing a Role for Bacterial Cellulose in Environmental Interactions: Lessons Learned from Diverse Biofilm-Producing Proteobacteria.

Authors:  Richard V Augimeri; Andrew J Varley; Janice L Strap
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Hetero-trans-β-glucanase, an enzyme unique to Equisetum plants, functionalizes cellulose.

Authors:  Thomas J Simmons; Kyle E Mohler; Claire Holland; Florence Goubet; Lenka Franková; Douglas R Houston; Andrew D Hudson; Frank Meulewaeter; Stephen C Fry
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  Links between plant and fungal diversity in habitat fragments of coastal shrubland.

Authors:  Mia R Maltz; Kathleen K Treseder; Krista L McGuire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  All-Cellulose Composites: A Review of Recent Studies on Structure, Properties and Applications.

Authors:  Behnaz Baghaei; Mikael Skrifvars
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 9.  Systematic Hydrogen-Bond Manipulations To Establish Polysaccharide Structure-Property Correlations.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Theodore Tyrikos-Ergas; Yuntao Zhu; Giulio Fittolani; Vittorio Bordoni; Ankush Singhal; Richard J Fair; Andrea Grafmüller; Peter H Seeberger; Martina Delbianco
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 15.336

10.  On the orientation of the chains in the mercerized cellulose.

Authors:  Dmitry V Zlenko; Sergey V Stovbun; Daria N Vtyurina; Sergey V Usachev; Aleksey A Skoblin; Mariya G Mikhaleva; Galina G Politenkova; Sergey N Nikolsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.