Literature DB >> 9298083

Satisfaction with inpatient acquired immunodeficiency syndrome care. A national comparison of dedicated and scattered-bed units.

L H Aiken1, D M Sloane, E T Lake.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether there were differences in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients' satisfaction with inpatient nursing care on dedicated AIDS units compared with conventional, multidiagnosis medical units.
METHODS: Interview data were collected from more than 600 consecutive AIDS admissions in 40 patient care units in 20 hospitals in 11 high AIDS incidence cities. Ten hospitals with dedicated AIDS units were matched with comparable hospitals treating AIDS patients on multidiagnosis medical units. AIDS patients' satisfaction with nursing care on dedicated AIDS units was compared with AIDS patients' satisfaction with care on scattered-bed units in the same hospital and with AIDS patients' satisfaction on scattered-bed units in different, matched hospitals without dedicated units. Interhospital differences that were not controlled by design were controlled statistically, as were differences in patient characteristics and illness severity.
RESULTS: Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients receiving care on dedicated AIDS units were significantly more satisfied with their nursing care. In hospitals with units of both types, dedicated AIDS units had a higher proportion of white patients, men, and homosexuals, whereas scattered-bed units had more minority patients and intravenous drug users. Controlling for these factors as well as for differences in illness severity and interhospital differences in patient satisfaction did not diminish the positive AIDS unit effect on patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated AIDS units achieve higher levels of satisfaction among patients with AIDS than general medical units. There is no evidence that patients feel isolated or stigmatized on dedicated AIDS units compared with patients on general units, and many patients have a clear preference for dedicated units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9298083     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199709000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

1.  Hospital organisation and outcomes.

Authors:  L H Aiken; D M Sloane; J Sochalski
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

2.  The relationship between hospital work environment and nurse outcomes in Guangdong, China: a nurse questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Ke Liu; Li-Ming You; Shao-Xian Chen; Yuan-Tao Hao; Xiao-Wen Zhu; Li-Feng Zhang; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  A pilot study of a systematic method for translating patient satisfaction questionnaires.

Authors:  Ke Liu; Allison Squires; Li-Ming You
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  The importance of a high-performance work environment in hospitals.

Authors:  Dana Beth Weinberg; Ariel Chanan Avgar; Noreen M Sugrue; Dianne Cooney-Miner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Nurse burnout and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Doris C Vahey; Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Sean P Clarke; Delfino Vargas
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The Magnet Nursing Services Recognition Program: a comparison of two groups of magnet hospitals.

Authors:  Linda H Aiken; Donna S Havens; Douglas M Sloane
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.737

7.  A national cross-sectional study on nurses' intent to leave and job satisfaction in Lebanon: implications for policy and practice.

Authors:  Fadi El-Jardali; Hani Dimassi; Nuhad Dumit; Diana Jamal; Gladys Mouro
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2009-03-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.