T Sakamoto1, M Fujimaki, K Tazawa. 1. Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sugitani, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated ileocolon interposition as a substitute stomach after total gastrectomy (TG) or proximal gastrectomy (PG). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although the jejunum frequently is used for reconstruction to create a substitute stomach after TG or PG, there are few reports on ileocolon interposition. METHODS: The authors performed ileocolon interposition in 47 patients who underwent TG (N = 18) or PG (N = 29) for malignant gastric lesion and evaluated the function of this structure as a substitute stomach using esophagoscopy, manometry, pH-metry, emptying time, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and postoperative body weight changes. RESULTS: No patient reported any reflux symptoms or showed endoscopic findings of reflux esophagitis. These results were well supported by manometry and acid loading pH-metry. Emptying time and OGTT showed good capacity as a reservoir of food, and the postoperative body weight averaged more than 90% of preoperative weight. Clinically, no significant difference between these two groups was recognized during long-term follow-up for up to 12 years after operation. There were no cases of direct operative death, and the 5- and 10-year survival rates were 64.7% and 40.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ileocolon interposition after TG or PG has the advantages of preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis and of providing functional replacement of the stomach as a reservoir for ingested food.
OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated ileocolon interposition as a substitute stomach after total gastrectomy (TG) or proximal gastrectomy (PG). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although the jejunum frequently is used for reconstruction to create a substitute stomach after TG or PG, there are few reports on ileocolon interposition. METHODS: The authors performed ileocolon interposition in 47 patients who underwent TG (N = 18) or PG (N = 29) for malignant gastric lesion and evaluated the function of this structure as a substitute stomach using esophagoscopy, manometry, pH-metry, emptying time, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and postoperative body weight changes. RESULTS: No patient reported any reflux symptoms or showed endoscopic findings of reflux esophagitis. These results were well supported by manometry and acid loading pH-metry. Emptying time and OGTT showed good capacity as a reservoir of food, and the postoperative body weight averaged more than 90% of preoperative weight. Clinically, no significant difference between these two groups was recognized during long-term follow-up for up to 12 years after operation. There were no cases of direct operative death, and the 5- and 10-year survival rates were 64.7% and 40.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ileocolon interposition after TG or PG has the advantages of preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis and of providing functional replacement of the stomach as a reservoir for ingested food.
Authors: Jürg Metzger; Lukas P Degen; Christoph Beglinger; Martin Siegemund; Wolfgang Studer; Michael Heberer; Felix Harder; Markus O von Flüe Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 12.969