Literature DB >> 21953142

Gastric tube reconstruction reduces postoperative gastroesophageal reflux in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.

Xiu-Feng Chen1, Bo Zhang, Zhi-Xin Chen, Jian-Kun Hu, Bin Dai, Fang Wang, Hong-Xin Yang, Jia-Ping Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anastomosis of gastric remnant to esophagus after proximal gastrectomy is the traditional surgical treatment procedure for patients with types II and III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. However, the postoperative complications such as gastroesophageal reflux are frequent. AIMS: To assess the outcome of the intraperitoneal anastomosis of the reconstructed gastric tube to esophagus after proximal gastrectomy for types II and III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.
METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive patients with preoperative diagnosis of type II or type III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction were recruited. Forty-one patients had the traditional anastomosis of gastric remnant to esophagus and 35 patients underwent an anastomosis of esophagus to a gastric tube that was constructed from the gastric remnant after proximal gastrectomy.
RESULTS: Twenty-three (56.1%) versus 12 (28.6%) patients (p = 0.016) complained various discomforts and/or were diagnosed with complications in the traditional group and gastric tube group, respectively, although there were no significant differences between the two groups in demographic data and pathological characteristics. Fourteen (34.1%) versus five (14.3%) patients (p = 0.046) complained of heartburn or acid regurgitation and nine (22.0%) versus two (5.7%) patients (p = 0.045) were confirmed reflux esophagitis in the traditional group and the gastric tube group, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The intraperitoneal anastomosis of the reconstructed gastric tube to esophagus demonstrates less complaints of gastroesophageal reflux and reflux esophagitis than the traditional anastomosis of gastric remnant to esophagus in the surgical treatment of types II and III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction in 1-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21953142     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1920-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  41 in total

1.  Clinical significance of tissue blood flow during esophagectomy by laser Doppler flowmetry.

Authors:  Y Ikeda; M Niimi; S Kan; T Shatari; H Takami; S Kodaira
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: incidence, characteristics, and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Shinichi Hasegawa; Takaki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach.

Authors:  Kay Washington
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Pernilla Viklund; Mats Lindblad; Ming Lu; Weimin Ye; Jan Johansson; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Primary and locally recurrent retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: local control and survival.

Authors:  T Lehnert; S Cardona; U Hinz; F Willeke; G Mechtersheimer; M Treiber; C Herfarth; M W Buechler; M H M Schwarzbach
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Functional evaluation after vagus-nerve-sparing laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Kojima; Hiroyuki Yamada; Mikito Inokuchi; Tatuyuki Kawano; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Ileocolon interposition as a substitute stomach after total or proximal gastrectomy.

Authors:  T Sakamoto; M Fujimaki; K Tazawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion does not cause adverse sequelae in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of unconfounded studies.

Authors:  F A McAlister; H D Clark; P S Wells; A Laupacis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Clinical outcome of proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Norio Shiraishi; Yosuke Adachi; Seigo Kitano; Kenji Kakisako; Masafumi Inomata; Kazuhiro Yasuda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Relation between recurrence of cancer of the colon and blood transfusion.

Authors:  N Blumberg; M M Agarwal; C Chuang
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-04-06
View more
  9 in total

1.  Adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Jing-Yu Deng; Han Liang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Side-overlap esophagogastric tube (SO-EG) reconstruction after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy or laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Hisahiro Hosogi; Masazumi Sakaguchi; Daisuke Yagi; Ryohei Onishi; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Yoshiharu Sakai; Seiichiro Kanaya
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction: outcomes of 37 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Nam-Ryong Choi; Min Ha Choi; Chang Seok Ko; Inseob Lee; Chung Sik Gong; Beom Su Kim
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Clinical outcomes of gastric tube reconstruction following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: experience with 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Toyomasu; Erito Mochiki; Toru Ishiguro; Tetsuya Ito; Okihide Suzuki; Kyoichi Ogata; Youichi Kumagai; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Hiroshi Saeki; Ken Shirabe; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Esophagogastrostomy plus gastrojejunostomy: a novel reconstruction procedure after curative resection for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shicai Chen; Jianchang Li; Haiying Liu; Jun Zeng; Guohua Yang; Jin Wang; Weiqun Lu; Nanrong Yu; Zhiliang Huang; Houwei Xu; Xiang Zeng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Changes of quality of life after gastric tube reconstruction in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Chaoyong Shen; Hongxin Yang; Bo Zhang; Haining Chen; Zhixin Chen; Jiaping Chen
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction for upper third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shuo-Meng Xiao; Ping Zhao; Zhi Ding; Rui Xu; Chao Yang; Xiao-Ting Wu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Model established based on blood markers predicts overall survival in patients after radical resection of types II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Zhi-Jian Wei; Ya-Ting Qiao; Bai-Chuan Zhou; Abigail N Rankine; Li-Xiang Zhang; Ye-Zhou Su; A-Man Xu; Wen-Xiu Han; Pan-Quan Luo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-08-27

Review 9.  Risk factors and therapeutic measures for postoperative complications associated with esophagectomy.

Authors:  Mojtaba Ahmadinejad; Ali Soltanian; Leila Haji Maghsoudi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.