Literature DB >> 9294274

Acute appendicitis--a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women. A prospective study on the role of laparoscopy.

P J Borgstein1, R V Gordijn, Q A Eijsbouts, M A Cuesta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aggressive surgical approach to patients suspected of having acute appendicitis for fear of perforation, and the inaccuracy of available diagnostic methods lead to an unacceptably high negative appendicectomy rate, especially in young women, in whom gynecological disorders frequently mimic appendicitis. Our objectives were to determine the value of diagnostic laparoscopy in women of child-bearing age to reduce the number of negative laparotomies and establish the correct diagnosis to allow prompt and appropriate treatment.
METHODS: 161 consecutive adult female patients under 50 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis underwent diagnostic laparoscopy prior to the planned appendicectomy. If an inflamed appendix was found, appendicectomy was usually done through a muscle-splitting McBurney incision. Other diagnoses were treated accordingly. A normal appendix was not removed. Results were compared to a group of 42 similar patients in whom the laparoscopy was omitted for various reasons, to 23 postmenopausal women, and to all 137 male adults, directly operated by the McBurney approach.
RESULTS: After laparoscopy, 55% of the patients required appendicectomy for appendicitis while in 23% a gynecological diagnosis was made in spite of previous examination by a gynecologist. Fourteen percent had a negative laparoscopy. There were no false-negative results. The negative appendicectomy rate after laparoscopy was 5% due to two false positives and eight laparoscopy failures. In the group of fertile females who escaped laparoscopy the negative appendicectomy rate was 38%. The respective rates for postmenopausal women and men were 4% and 8%.
CONCLUSIONS: All women of child-bearing age suspected of having acute appendicitis should undergo diagnostic laparoscopy prior to the planned appendicectomy, regardless of the certainty of the preoperative diagnosis. This is currently the only way to reduce the negative appendicectomy rate and establish a correct diagnosis allowing prompt and appropriate treatment. In male patients and postmenopausal women one may proceed directly to emergency appendicectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9294274     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

Review 1.  Early laparoscopy for the evaluation of nonspecific abdominal pain: a critical appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Luis C Domínguez; Alvaro Sanabria; Valentin Vega; Camilo Osorio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens.

Authors:  Ravi Marudanayagam; Geraint T Williams; Brian I Rees
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Selective use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  W T van den Broek; A B Bijnen; P V van Eerten; P de Ruiter; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Introducing diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A C Moberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  I Chamisa
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Routine diagnostic laparoscopy reduces the rate of unnecessary appendicectomies in young women.

Authors:  S Garbarino; S M Shimi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed? : A single-center review of a 15-year experience.

Authors:  F Agresta; G Mazzarolo; L F Ciardo; N Bedin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohhmann and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scores for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Hasan Erdem; Süleyman Çetinkünar; Koray Daş; Enver Reyhan; Cumhur Değer; Mehmet Aziret; Hilmi Bozkurt; Selçuk Uzun; Selim Sözen; Oktay İrkörücü
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Pathologic evaluation of appendectomy specimens in children: is routine histopatholgic examination indicated?

Authors:  Maryam Monajemzadeh; Mohammad-Taghi Hagghi-Ashtiani; Laleh Montaser-Kouhsari; Hamed Ahmadi; Heidar Zargoosh; Mehdi Kalantari
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.364

10.  Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate?

Authors:  Gamal Khairy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.