Literature DB >> 9292984

Substratum topography influences susceptibility of Salmonella enteritidis biofilms to trisodium phosphate.

D R Korber1, A Choi, G M Wolfaardt, S C Ingham, D E Caldwell.   

Abstract

Established (48- and 72-h) Salmonella enteritidis biofilms grown in glass flow cells with or without artificial crevices (0.5-, 0.3-, and 0.15-mm widths) were subjected to a 10% trisodium phosphate (TSP) solution under different flow regimens (0.3, 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 cm s-1). The abundance of biofilm remaining after TSP treatment, the biocidal efficacy of TSP, and the factors which contributed to bacterial survival were then evaluated by using confocal laser microscopy and a fluorescent viability probe. Biofilm age affected the amount of biofilm which remained following a 15-s exposure to TSP. After TSP treatment of 48-h biofilms, 29% of the original biofilm remained at the biofilm-liquid interface, whereas 75% of the biofilm remained at the base (the attachment surface). Following TSP treatment of 72-h biofilms, 27% of the biofilm material remained at the biofilm-liquid interface, 73% remained at the 5-micron depth, and 91% remained at the biofilm base. Results obtained using the BacLight viability probe indicated that TSP exposure killed all the cells in 48-h biofilms, whereas in the thicker 72-h biofilms, surviving bacteria (approximately 2% of the total) were found near the 5- and 0-micron depths. In the presence of artificially constructed crevices, an inverse relationship was shown to exist between bacterial survival (ranging from approximately 13 to 83% of total biofilm material) and crevice width. This relationship was further influenced by the velocity of TSP flow; high TSP flow velocities (1.8 cm s-1) resulted in the lowest number of surviving bacteria at the base of crevices (approximately 42% survival). Extended time courses demonstrated that after TSP stress was relieved, biofilms continued to grow within crevices but not in systems without crevices. It is suggested that advective TSP flux into crevices and through the biofilm matrix was enhanced under conditions of high flow. These results suggest that the inherent roughness of the substratum on which the biofilm was grown and the timing of TSP application are important factors controlling the efficacy of TSP treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9292984      PMCID: PMC168640          DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.9.3352-3358.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

Review 1.  Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response.

Authors:  P Gilbert; P J Collier; M R Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Multicellular organization in a degradative biofilm community.

Authors:  G M Wolfaardt; J R Lawrence; R D Robarts; S J Caldwell; D E Caldwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evaluation of Fleroxacin Activity against Established Pseudomonas fluorescens Biofilms.

Authors:  D R Korber; G A James; J W Costerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Factors promoting survival of bacteria in chlorinated water supplies.

Authors:  M W LeChevallier; C D Cawthon; R G Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Bacterial plasmolysis as a physical indicator of viability.

Authors:  D R Korber; A Choi; G M Wolfaardt; D E Caldwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Biofilms, the customized microniche.

Authors:  J W Costerton; Z Lewandowski; D DeBeer; D Caldwell; D Korber; G James
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Disinfection of bacteria attached to granular activated carbon.

Authors:  M W LeChevallier; T S Hassenauer; A K Camper; G A McFeters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms.

Authors:  J R Lawrence; D R Korber; B D Hoyle; J W Costerton; D E Caldwell
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Effect of trisodium phosphate on biofilm and planktonic cells of Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli O157: H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  E B Somers; J L Schoeni; A C Wong
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Phosphate and heat treatments to control Salmonella and reduce spoilage and rancidity on broiler carcasses.

Authors:  J E Thomson; J S Bailey; N A Cox
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  12 in total

1.  Physical morphology and surface properties of unsaturated Pseudomonas putida biofilms.

Authors:  I D Auerbach; C Sorensen; H G Hansma; P A Holden
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Subtractive Protein Profiling of Salmonella typhimurium Biofilm Treated with DMSO.

Authors:  Mohd Fakharul Zaman Raja Yahya; Zazali Alias; Saiful Anuar Karsani
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  Metabolic differentiation in biofilms as indicated by carbon dioxide production rates.

Authors:  Elanna Bester; Otini Kroukamp; Gideon M Wolfaardt; Leandro Boonzaaier; Steven N Liss
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Adhesion of Candida spp. and Pichia spp. to Wooden Surfaces.

Authors:  Ružica Tomičić; Zorica Tomičić; Peter Raspor
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.918

5.  Commonly used disinfectants fail to eradicate Salmonella enterica biofilms from food contact surface materials.

Authors:  M Corcoran; D Morris; N De Lappe; J O'Connor; P Lalor; P Dockery; M Cormican
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Roles of the spiA gene from Salmonella enteritidis in biofilm formation and virulence.

Authors:  Hongyan Dong; Daxin Peng; Xinan Jiao; Xiaorong Zhang; Shizhong Geng; Xiufan Liu
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 7.  Microbiological safety of drinking water: United States and global perspectives.

Authors:  T E Ford
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Confusion over live/dead stainings for the detection of vital microorganisms in oral biofilms--which stain is suitable?

Authors:  Lutz Netuschil; Thorsten M Auschill; Anton Sculean; Nicole B Arweiler
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 9.  Abundance and Distribution of Enteric Bacteria and Viruses in Coastal and Estuarine Sediments-a Review.

Authors:  Francis Hassard; Ceri L Gwyther; Kata Farkas; Anthony Andrews; Vera Jones; Brian Cox; Howard Brett; Davey L Jones; James E McDonald; Shelagh K Malham
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Role of CpxR in Biofilm Development: Expression of Key Fimbrial, O-Antigen and Virulence Operons of Salmonella Enteritidis.

Authors:  Deeksha Shetty; Juan E Abrahante; Samuel M Chekabab; Xuxiaochen Wu; Darren R Korber; Sinisa Vidovic
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.