Literature DB >> 9292898

Measurements of respiratory system resistance by the interrupter technique in healthy and asthmatic children.

M Oswald-Mammosser1, C Llerena, J P Speich, L Donata.   

Abstract

We studied respiratory system resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in healthy and asthmatic children, paying special attention to the effect of cheek compliance and the effects of supporting the cheeks, the influence of lung volume at which interruption was performed, the effect of direction of flow before occlusion (inspiration vs. expiration), and short-term reproducibility of this method. One hundred and thirty-two children (36 controls and 96 asthmatics) were included in the study (mean, 9.0 +/- SD 3.6 years). Rint was calculated from the ratio of the alveolar pressure (estimated from moth pressure during occlusion) to the flow prior to interruption. We observed that 1) underestimation of airway resistance due to upper airway compliance can be minimized by supporting the cheeks; Rint was significantly lower when measured without supporting the cheeks than with support of the cheeks in controls (3.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 4.7 +/- 1.2 cmH2O.L-1.s, respectively) and asthmatics (5.2 +/- 1.6 vs 6.9 +/- 2.0 cmH2O.L-1.s); the quantitative differences of Rint with and without cheek support was larger in small children and in the most obstructed children; 2) performing occlusion at mid-tidal volume accurately reflected the respiratory system resistance of the whole respiratory cycle since we observed no difference in Rint when performing occlusion at different volumes during quiet respiration or at the middle of tidal volume; 3) Rint measured during expiration was higher than Rint obtained during inspiration in controls and in asthmatics; moreover, the effect of direction of flow before occlusion was greater in the small children; 4) Rint was closely correlated to height in controls (r = -0.82; P < 0.001); and 5) short-term reproducibility (at 15 min intervals) was satisfactory in controls and asthmatics (coefficients of variation were 9% and 7%, respectively).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9292898     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199708)24:2<78::aid-ppul2>3.0.co;2-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol        ISSN: 1099-0496


  5 in total

1.  Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: normative data for 2-10 year olds of three ethnicities.

Authors:  S A McKenzie; E Chan; I Dundas; P D Bridge; C S Pao; M Mylonopoulou; M J R Healy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Effects of the menstrual cycle on expiratory resistance during whole body exercise in females.

Authors:  Alethea J Anderson; Mark A Babcock
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Impulse oscillometry in the evaluation of diseases of the airways in children.

Authors:  Hirsh D Komarow; Ian A Myles; Ashraf Uzzaman; Dean D Metcalfe
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 6.347

4.  Reference values of interrupter respiratory resistance in healthy preschool white children.

Authors:  E Lombardi; P D Sly; G Concutelli; E Novembre; G Veneruso; G Frongia; R Bernardini; A Vierucci
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Plethysmograph and interrupter resistance measurements in prematurely born young children.

Authors:  M R Thomas; G F Rafferty; R Blowes; J L Peacock; N Marlow; S Calvert; A Milner; A Greenough
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 5.747

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.