OBJECTIVE: 1. To develop McKnee, a classification system and direct utility measure for health states associated with knee replacement (KR) surgery. 2. To apply McKnee in a before-after study of KR surgery to: (i) gain experience with McKnee in an elderly population; (ii) confirm the practicality and usefulness of the McKnee system; (iii) assess self-health utility one week before and 3 mo after surgery; (iv) evaluate the stability of 3 clinical marker health states describing mild, moderate, and severe knee disability; (v) compare self-health utility scores with Short Form 36 (SF-36). METHODS: 1. Instrument development: The McKnee modified Health Utilities Index was developed and used to describe self-health and clinical marker health states: the clinical validity of the clinical marker states was evaluated by 5 clinicians involved in the care off KR patients. 2. Instrument evaluation: McKnee and the SF-36 were administered to 48 patients with osteoarthritis one week before and 3 mo after KR surgery. RESULTS: Before-after study: McKnee was feasible and acceptable in the older patient group studied (mean age in years, SD: 69.9, 8.6). No change in self-health utility (mean, SD) was observed at 3 mo postsurgery: before -0.78, 0.17; after -0.78, 0.21. On the SF-36, only the change scores for pain and health transition were statistically significant. Utilities (mean, SD) for the clinical marker health states were: mild -0.80, 0.20; moderate -0.55, 0.28; and severe -0.48, 0.31. The clinical marker mean utility scores were stable between the baseline and 3 mo assessment, but the intraclass correlation coefficients for individual scores were low. CONCLUSION: McKnee provides a preference based measure of health related quality of life that can be used to obtain and interpret clinically the knee disability utility scorers needed for cost-utility studies and medical decision-making models about KR surgery. The McKnee system provides a practical and useful method for classifying knee disability health states and obtaining direct measurements of utility scores for selected health states.
OBJECTIVE: 1. To develop McKnee, a classification system and direct utility measure for health states associated with knee replacement (KR) surgery. 2. To apply McKnee in a before-after study of KR surgery to: (i) gain experience with McKnee in an elderly population; (ii) confirm the practicality and usefulness of the McKnee system; (iii) assess self-health utility one week before and 3 mo after surgery; (iv) evaluate the stability of 3 clinical marker health states describing mild, moderate, and severe knee disability; (v) compare self-health utility scores with Short Form 36 (SF-36). METHODS: 1. Instrument development: The McKnee modified Health Utilities Index was developed and used to describe self-health and clinical marker health states: the clinical validity of the clinical marker states was evaluated by 5 clinicians involved in the care off KR patients. 2. Instrument evaluation: McKnee and the SF-36 were administered to 48 patients with osteoarthritis one week before and 3 mo after KR surgery. RESULTS: Before-after study: McKnee was feasible and acceptable in the older patient group studied (mean age in years, SD: 69.9, 8.6). No change in self-health utility (mean, SD) was observed at 3 mo postsurgery: before -0.78, 0.17; after -0.78, 0.21. On the SF-36, only the change scores for pain and health transition were statistically significant. Utilities (mean, SD) for the clinical marker health states were: mild -0.80, 0.20; moderate -0.55, 0.28; and severe -0.48, 0.31. The clinical marker mean utility scores were stable between the baseline and 3 mo assessment, but the intraclass correlation coefficients for individual scores were low. CONCLUSION: McKnee provides a preference based measure of health related quality of life that can be used to obtain and interpret clinically the knee disability utility scorers needed for cost-utility studies and medical decision-making models about KR surgery. The McKnee system provides a practical and useful method for classifying knee disability health states and obtaining direct measurements of utility scores for selected health states.
Authors: Holger J Schünemann; Roger Goldstein; M Jeffery Mador; Douglas McKim; Elisabeth Stahl; Lauren E Griffith; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Peggy Austin; Gordon H Guyatt Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Laetitia Gerlier; Mark Lamotte; Micheline Wille; Peter C Kreuz; Johan Vanlauwe; Dominique Dubois; François M Meurgey Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2010 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: José Antonio Becerra Fontal; Joan Bagó Granell; Josep Garré Olmo; Ramón Roig Busquets; Francisco Peris Prats; Carlos Villanueva Leal Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2012-12-24 Impact factor: 3.134