Literature DB >> 9290705

Analysis of genetic alterations in uterine leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas by comparative genomic hybridization.

J P Packenham1, S du Manoir, E Schrock, J I Risinger, D Dixon, D N Denz, J A Evans, A Berchuck, J C Barrett, T R Devereux, T Ried.   

Abstract

Uterine leiomyomas are the most prevalent tumor type in women of reproductive age and are the most common reason for hysterectomies. Although uterine leiomyomas are considered to be benign, they are a major public health concern for women. In contrast, leiomyosarcomas are rare but highly malignant uterine tumors. They may arise in uteri with preexisting leiomyomas and histologically sometimes resemble leiomyomas, thus causing controversy about whether leiomyosarcomas arise within leiomyomas. In this study, we used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to identify genetic alterations unique to each tumor type and alterations that are common between the two tumors. We analyzed 14 cases of uterine leiomyomas and eight cases of uterine leiomyosarcomas. Only two of the 14 leiomyomas exhibited genetic alterations, and those were restricted to gains on chromosomes 14 and 19 and losses on chromosomes 1 and 4. In addition, 68 leiomyomas were examined for loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 1 and 4, and only three tumors exhibited any losses. In contrast, all eight leiomyosarcomas showed gains and losses of DNA by CGH, and in many cases multiple changes were observed. The most commonly observed genetic aberration, occurring in five tumors, was gains on both arms of chromosome 1, suggesting that this chromosome contains loci involved in the development of leiomyosarcoma. Our results do not provide evidence for the progression from benign leiomyoma to malignant leiomyosarcoma. Moreover, the large number of random chromosomal alterations in the leiomyosarcomas suggests that increased genetic instability plays a role in the formation of these tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9290705     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2744(199708)19:4<273::aid-mc9>3.0.co;2-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Carcinog        ISSN: 0899-1987            Impact factor:   4.784


  18 in total

1.  Analysis of molecular cytogenetic alterations in uterine leiomyosarcoma by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Mohammad Raish; Mohsin Khurshid; Mushtaq Ahmad Ansari; Pankaj Kumar Chaturvedi; Su-Mi Bae; Jang Heub Kim; Eun Kyung Park; Dong Chun Park; Woong Shick Ahn
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Different characteristics of mitochondrial microsatellite instability between uterine leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas.

Authors:  Jae-Ho Lee; Tae-Yung Ryu; Chi-Heum Cho; Dae-Kwang Kim
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  A small-molecule inhibitor targeting the mitotic spindle checkpoint impairs the growth of uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Weiwei Shan; Patricia Y Akinfenwa; Kari B Savannah; Nonna Kolomeyevskaya; Rudolfo Laucirica; Dafydd G Thomas; Kunle Odunsi; Chad J Creighton; Dina C Lev; Matthew L Anderson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Genome-wide analysis of loss of heterozygosity and copy number amplification in uterine leiomyomas using the 100K single nucleotide polymorphism array.

Authors:  Kellen L Meadows; Danica M K Andrews; Zongli Xu; Gleta K Carswell; Shannon K Laughlin; Donna D Baird; Jack A Taylor
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.362

5.  Detection of novel copy number variants in uterine leiomyomas using high-resolution SNP arrays.

Authors:  Wayne Bowden; Josh Skorupski; Ertug Kovanci; Aleksandar Rajkovic
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 6.  What we could do now: molecular pathology of gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  C S Herrington
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2001-08

Review 7.  Epidemiological and genetic clues for molecular mechanisms involved in uterine leiomyoma development and growth.

Authors:  Arno E Commandeur; Aaron K Styer; Jose M Teixeira
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  Frequent loss of heterozygosity for chromosome 10 in uterine leiomyosarcoma in contrast to leiomyoma.

Authors:  B J Quade; A P Pinto; D R Howard; W A Peters; C P Crum
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Exploring chromosomal abnormalities and genetic changes in uterine smooth muscle tumors.

Authors:  Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Ellen Heitzer; Karin Flicker; Stephanie Müller; Peter Ulz; Ozlen Saglam; Fattaneh Tavassoli; Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran; Jochen Geigl; Farid Moinfar
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 10.  Advanced molecular cytogenetics in human and mouse.

Authors:  Kathleen Dorritie; Cristina Montagna; Michael J Difilippantonio; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.