Literature DB >> 9286764

Site of osteodensitometry in perimenopausal women: correlation and limits of agreement between anatomic regions.

B Abrahamsen1, T B Hansen, L B Jensen, A P Hermann, P Eiken.   

Abstract

Because the bone mineral density (BMD) in different anatomic regions is heterogenous the number of women who fulfill the World Health Organization definition of osteopenia or osteoporosis increases with the number of regions examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement between measurements of the spine, femur, forearm, and whole body following menopause. Two thousand and five healthy, perimenopausal women, mean age 50.6 years, were studied using Hologic QDR-1000/W and QDR-2000 densitometers. Though the BMD of different anatomic regions were correlated (r = 0.40-0.77, p < 0.01), the variability in each patient regarding T and Z scores between regions was considerable. For example, despite a high correlation (r = 0.67, p < 0.01) and no systematic difference between the T scores for total femoral and lumbar BMD, the limits of agreement (mean difference +/- 2 SD) for the comparison were -1.89 to 1.87. Femoral neck T scores were 0.5 SD lower than those of the other regions, confirming reports that the young adult reference for this measurement is disproportionally high. The prevalence of osteoporosis was 1.2% when femur total BMD was considered alone and 5.9% when lumbar and ultradistal forearm results were included. However, as many as 7.9% showed osteoporosis of the femoral neck when the Hologic T score was used, compared with 0.7% using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) values. The choice of anatomic region and availability of appropriate young adult reference data has considerable impact on the apparent prevalence of osteoporosis. Given the heterogeneity between regions, a combination of spinal and femoral densitometry should be used in diagnosing osteoporosis, though this increases the prevalence of osteoporosis by 50% or more in perimenopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9286764     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.9.1471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  12 in total

Review 1.  An update on the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Number of osteoporotic sites as a modifying factor for bone mineral density.

Authors:  Jong Seok Lee; Sungwha Lee; Ohk-Hyun Ryu; Moon-Gi Choi; Youn Ji Kim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Endpoint comparison for bone mineral density measurements in North Central Cancer Treatment Group cancer clinical trials N02C1 and N03CC (Alliance).

Authors:  A C Dueck; J Singh; P Atherton; H Liu; P Novotny; S Hines; C L Loprinzi; E A Perez; A Tan; K Burger; X Zhao; B Diekmann; J A Sloan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Association between passive smoking in adulthood and phalangeal bone mineral density: results from the KRAM study--the Danish Health Examination Survey 2007-2008.

Authors:  T Holmberg; M Bech; T Curtis; K Juel; M Grønbæk; K Brixen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  High prevalence of low bone density in young Iranian healthy individuals.

Authors:  Iraj Salehi; Shabnam Khazaeli; Seyed Reza Najafizadeh; Haleh Ashraf; Mahdi Malekpour
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Prospective comparison of the therapeutic effect of teriparatide with that of combined vertebroplasty with antiresorptive agents for the treatment of new-onset adjacent vertebral compression fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Y-Y Tseng; C-H Su; T-N Lui; Y-S Yeh; S-H Yeh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Osteoporosis among Fallers without Concomitant Fracture Identified in an Emergency Department: Frequencies and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Bente Glintborg; Ulrik Hesse; Thomas Houe; Jensen Claus Munk; Jan Pødenphant; Bo Zerahn
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2010-11-08

8.  Bone mineral density and the subsequent risk of cancer in the NHANES I follow-up cohort.

Authors:  Richard L Nelson; Mary Turyk; Jane Kim; Victoria Persky
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Normal range of BMD in proximal tibia as a different skeletal site at women.

Authors:  Mustafa Arif Aluclu; Fatih Bati; Ersoy Kekilli
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2017-01-25

10.  Impact of beverage consumption, age, and site dependency on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements in perimenopausal women: a prospective study.

Authors:  Huan-Chu Lo; Duen-Pang Kuo; Yen-Lin Chen
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.