Literature DB >> 9285872

Modular shoulder arthroplasty.

G M Gartsman1, J A Russell, E Gaenslen.   

Abstract

One hundred consecutive Biomet modular shoulder arthroplasties were studied prospectively and were evaluated with a minimum 2-year follow-up (average 41 months). Fifty-seven women and 43 men with an average age of 64 years were evaluated for pain, activities of daily living, range of motion, cost, and complications. Fourteen patients had undergone previous surgery to the shoulder. Seventy patients underwent total shoulder arthroplasty, and thirty underwent hemiarthroplasty. Pain and range of motion demonstrated statistically significant improvement. Eight activities of daily living were rated on a 0 to 3 scale, and all were significantly improved. Complications were noted in 18 patients and included urinary retention, pulmonary embolus, rotator cuff tear, titanium synovitis, subluxation, and dislocation. Twelve shoulders underwent secondary procedures for rotator cuff repair, open reduction, and component revision for instability. Lucent lines were present in 62.5% of glenoids, 92.3% of cemented stems, and 0% of cementless stems on postoperative radiographs. No patients underwent revision surgery for component loosening, and no cases of humeral head-stem dissociation were seen. Ninety-five shoulders were rated by the patients as improved, and five were made worse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9285872     DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(97)90000-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  11 in total

Review 1.  Which primary shoulder and elbow replacement? A review of the results of prostheses available in the UK.

Authors:  D C Mackay; B Hudson; J R Williams
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Does an increase in modularity improve the outcomes of total shoulder replacement? Comparison across design generations.

Authors:  Bradley Schoch; Jean-David Werthel; Cathy Schleck; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing mini-stem humeral components: technique and short-term results.

Authors:  Patrick W Jost; Joshua S Dines; Matthew H Griffith; Michael Angel; David W Altchek; David M Dines
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-27

Review 4.  Economic evaluations in shoulder pathologies: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ifedayo O Kuye; Nitin B Jain; Lauren Warner; James H Herndon; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  The glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark Schrumpf; Travis Maak; Sommer Hammoud; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

6.  Modular total shoulder system with short stem. A prospective clinical and radiological analysis.

Authors:  M A J van de Sande; P M Rozing
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Total Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Glenohumeral Arthritis According to Preoperative Glenoid Erosion.

Authors:  Marc-Frederic Pastor; Melena Kaufmann; Andre Gettmann; Mathias Wellmann; Tomas Smith
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2015-06-16

8.  Efficacy of anatomical prostheses in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Paolo Paladini; Fabrizio Campi; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-03-03

9.  Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Humeral Head in Young, Active Patients: Midterm Results.

Authors:  Nicholas D Iagulli; Larry D Field; E Rhett Hobgood; James A Hurt; Ryan Charles; Michael J O'Brien; Felix H Savoie
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-01-21

10.  A multicenter, prospective 2-year analysis of the Sidus stem-free shoulder arthroplasty system.

Authors:  George S Athwal; Ryan J Krupp; Grant Carlson; Ryan T Bicknell
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2019-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.