Literature DB >> 9285803

Magnetic resonance renography: optimisation of pulse sequence parameters and Gd-DTPA dose, and comparison with radionuclide renography.

J Taylor1, P E Summers, S F Keevil, A M Saks, J Diskin, P J Hilton, A B Ayers.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of magnetic resonance renography (MRR) using gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) in comparison with conventional radionuclide renography (RR) using technetium-99m-DTPA (99mTc-DTPA). MRR has many advantages over RR, including lack of ionising radiation, increased spatial resolution, and visible background anatomy. By optimising the pulse sequence, we developed an MRR protocol in which signal intensity is linear with Gd-DTPA concentration over a clinically relevant range. Twenty-nine patients and a volunteer were studied using this protocol. Magnetic resonance renography was performed using three different doses of Gd-DTPA: 0.1 mmol kg-1 (n = 13), 0.05 mmol kg-1 (n = 7), and 0.025 mmol kg-1 (n = 9). Each patient was also assessed using radionuclide renography. The resulting renograms were assessed in terms of time to peak signal intensity, signal decrease after peak, and kidney function ratios calculated from both the areas underneath and the slopes of the uptake curves. We have shown that the MR renograms obtained using low dose Gd-DTPA correlate best with the radionuclide renograms. Remaining discrepancies may be explained by variations in the injection procedures (hence in arterial input functions) and the limited coverage of the three MRR slices compared to the whole body projection of RR. Furthermore, at high local concentrations, signal becomes independent of T1 and is dominated by T2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9285803     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(97)00034-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  8 in total

1.  Direct visualization of crossing renal vessels on MRU achieved by splitting intravenous contrast dose.

Authors:  Murat Kocaoğlu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-12-30

Review 2.  MR urography in children.

Authors:  J Damien Grattan-Smith; Richard A Jones
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-06-22

3.  MR urography in children. Part 2: how to use ImageJ MR urography processing software.

Authors:  Pierre-Hugues Vivier; Michael Dolores; Melissa Taylor; Jean-Nicolas Dacher
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-02-25

4.  Measurement of Murine Single-Kidney Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Kai Jiang; Hui Tang; Prasanna K Mishra; Slobodan I Macura; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  MR urography in children. Part 1: how we do the F0 technique.

Authors:  Pierre-Hugues Vivier; Michael Dolores; Melissa Taylor; Frederic Elbaz; Agnes Liard; Jean-Nicolas Dacher
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-02-25

Review 6.  Assessment of renal function with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Louisa Bokacheva; Henry Rusinek; Jeff L Zhang; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  Mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ reduced renal damage caused by ischemia-reperfusion injury in rodent kidneys: Longitudinal observations of T2 -weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Xiaoge Liu; Michael P Murphy; Wei Xing; Huanhuan Wu; Rui Zhang; Haoran Sun
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MR CEST Urography: An Emerging Tool in the Diagnosis and Management of Upper Urinary Tract Obstruction.

Authors:  Shaowei Bo; Farzad Sedaghat; KowsalyaDevi Pavuluri; Steven P Rowe; Andrew Cohen; Max Kates; Michael T McMahon
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-03-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.