Literature DB >> 9284061

Assessment of locomotor activity, acoustic and tactile startle, and prepulse inhibition of startle in inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids: implications of genetic background for single gene and quantitative trait loci analyses.

S F Logue1, E H Owen, D L Rasmussen, J M Wehner.   

Abstract

As the use of transgenic and null mutation techniques in the development of animal models of disorders increases, the importance of selecting the appropriate genetic background also increases. The genetic background of the mouse strains used as models for various disorders is critical because of the potential for epistatic effects on the expression of transgenes and null mutations. Twelve strains of inbred mice and seven F1 hybrids were tested in multiple behavioural tasks including open-field locomotor activity, Y-maze activity, auditory and tactile startle and prepulse inhibition of startle response. Differences across genotypes were found for all variables measured. The range of variability among genotypes was dependent on the specific measure so careful consideration must be made in selecting a strain for testing a particular behaviour. Because of the polygenic nature of each of the behavioural phenotypes, the impact of a single gene manipulation may vary depending on the genetic background on which it is expressed. Moreover, quantitative trait loci methods could be applied to these behaviours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9284061     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00164-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  50 in total

1.  Statistical parameters in behavioral tasks and implications for sample size of C57BL/6J:129S6/SvEvTac mixed strain mice.

Authors:  S J Estill; K Fay; J A Garcia
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Mapping of quantitative trait loci with knockout/congenic strains.

Authors:  V J Bolivar; M N Cook; L Flaherty
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Reevaluating hippocampus-dependent learning in FVB/N mice.

Authors:  Sean J Farley; Bridget M McKay; John F Disterhoft; Craig Weiss
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Genetic background modulates behavioral impairments in R6/2 mice and suggests a role for dominant genetic modifiers in Huntington’s disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Randi-Michelle Cowin; Nghiem Bui; Deanna Graham; Jennie R Green; Lisa A Yuva-Paylor; Andreas Weiss; Richard Paylor
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Comparison of the performance of DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice in transitive inference and foreground and background contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  Jessica M André; Kristy A Cordero; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Two quantitative trait loci for prepulse inhibition of startle identified on mouse chromosome 16 using chromosome substitution strains.

Authors:  Tracey L Petryshen; Andrew Kirby; Ronald P Hammer; Shaun Purcell; Sinead B O'Leary; Jonathan B Singer; Annie E Hill; Joseph H Nadeau; Mark J Daly; Pamela Sklar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Effects of sex on ethanol conditioned place preference, activity and variability in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  Christopher L Cunningham; Chloe N Shields
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Affective and somatic aspects of spontaneous and precipitated nicotine withdrawal in C57BL/6J and BALB/cByJ mice.

Authors:  Astrid K Stoker; Svetlana Semenova; Athina Markou
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Differences in startle reflex and prepulse inhibition in European-Americans and African-Americans.

Authors:  Wendy Hasenkamp; Seth D Norrholm; Amanda Green; Barbara Lewison; William Boshoven; Megan Keyes; Erica Duncan
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Genetic background differences and nonassociative effects in mouse trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  Dani R Smith; Michela Gallagher; Mark E Stanton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.