A Faas1, F G Schellevis, J T Van Eijk. 1. Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO Institute), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in NIDDM patients from studies published during the years 1976-1996. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted. The selected studies were assessed for their methodological quality and reviewed on the reported efficacy and on the following topics: characteristics of the study population, follow-up duration, nature of the efficacy measures, use of a therapy decision scheme, nature of the intervention, nature of the SMBG device, patient instruction, type of SMBG regime, assessment of the frequency of self-measurement, and whether feedback was given on the measured glucose levels. Studies with positive conclusions on the efficacy of SMBG were compared with studies with negative conclusions on the basis of the these characteristics to determine which factors could have contributed to the results. RESULTS: Of the 11 studies identified, only 4 met all quality criteria. Six of the studies were randomized controlled trials, of which only one showed positive conclusions regarding the efficacy of SMBG. Although the studies differed on most topics, no factor could be identified as responsible for the results of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of SMBG in NIDDM patients is still questionable and should be tested in a rigorous high-quality randomized controlled trial, for which some recommendations are given.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in NIDDMpatients from studies published during the years 1976-1996. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted. The selected studies were assessed for their methodological quality and reviewed on the reported efficacy and on the following topics: characteristics of the study population, follow-up duration, nature of the efficacy measures, use of a therapy decision scheme, nature of the intervention, nature of the SMBG device, patient instruction, type of SMBG regime, assessment of the frequency of self-measurement, and whether feedback was given on the measured glucose levels. Studies with positive conclusions on the efficacy of SMBG were compared with studies with negative conclusions on the basis of the these characteristics to determine which factors could have contributed to the results. RESULTS: Of the 11 studies identified, only 4 met all quality criteria. Six of the studies were randomized controlled trials, of which only one showed positive conclusions regarding the efficacy of SMBG. Although the studies differed on most topics, no factor could be identified as responsible for the results of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of SMBG in NIDDMpatients is still questionable and should be tested in a rigorous high-quality randomized controlled trial, for which some recommendations are given.
Authors: Anders Tengblad; Ewa Grodzinsky; Kjell Lindström; Sigvard Mölstad; Lars Borgquist; Carl Johan Ostgren Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: David B Sacks; Mark Arnold; George L Bakris; David E Bruns; Andrea Rita Horvath; M Sue Kirkman; Ake Lernmark; Boyd E Metzger; David M Nathan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Elizabeth Russell-Minda; Jeffrey Jutai; Mark Speechley; Kaitlin Bradley; Anna Chudyk; Robert Petrella Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2009-11-01