Literature DB >> 9283107

Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile scintimammography in the detection of breast tumours.

H Palmedo1, H Bender, F Grünwald, P Mallmann, P Zamora, D Krebs, H J Biersack.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare, in breast cancer patients, the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and scintimammography (SMM) using technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI). A total of 20 patients (40 breasts with 22 lesions) were evaluated serially with MIBI and, on the following day, with FDG. For SMM, planar and single-photon emission tomography imaging in the prone position was performed starting at 10 min following the injection of MIBI (740 MBq). For PET, scans were acquired 45-60 min after the injection of FDG (370 MBq) and attentuation correction was performed following transmission scans. Results from SMM and PET were subsequently compared with the histopathology results. True-positive results were obtained in 12/13 primary breast cancers (mean diameter=29 mm, range 8-53 mm) with both FDG and MIBI. False-negative results were obtained in two local recurrences (diameter <9 mm) with both FDG and MIBI. In benign disease, FDG and MIBI did not localize three fibrocystic lesions, two fibroadenomas and one inflammatory lesion (true-negative), but both localized one fibroadenoma (false-positive). Collectively, the results demonstrate a sensitivity of 92%, and a specificity of 86%, for primary breast cancer regardless of whether FDG or MIBI was used. In contrast to MIBI scintigraphy, FDG PET scored the axillae correctly as either positive (metastatic disease) or negative (no axillary disease) in all 12 patients. The tumour/non-tumour ratio for MIBI was 1.97 (range 1.43-3.1). The mean standard uptake value (SUV) for FDG uptake was 2.57 (range 0.3-6.2). The diagnostic accuracy of SMM was equivalent to that of FDG PET for the detection of primary breast cancer. For the detection of in situ lymph node metastases of the axilla, FDG seems to be more sensitive than 99mTc-MIBI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9283107     DOI: 10.1007/bf01254246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  11 in total

1.  Oncologic positron emission tomography: a surgical perspective.

Authors:  Todd O Moore; Landis K Griffeth
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

2.  A matter of collection and detection for intraoperative and noninvasive near-infrared fluorescence molecular imaging: to see or not to see?

Authors:  Banghe Zhu; John C Rasmussen; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Standardized uptake values of normal breast tissue with 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D: -glucose positron emission tomography: variations with age, breast density, and menopausal status.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Anil Chauhan; Hongming Zhuang; Prem Chandra; Mitchell Schnall; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality for the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer with correlation to tumour size and grade.

Authors:  R V Tadwalkar; J A Rapelyea; J Torrente; L R Rechtman; C B Teal; A P McSwain; C Donnelly; A B Kidwell; C M Coffey; R F Brem
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET.

Authors:  Gerhard W Goerres; Sven C A Michel; Mathias K Fehr; Achim H Kaim; Hans C Steinert; Burkhardt Seifert; Gustav K von Schulthess; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  A systematic review of FDG-PET in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Escalona; J A Blasco; M M Reza; E Andradas; N Gómez
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Mastopathic-type fibroadenoma and ductal adenoma of the breast with false-positive fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Rin Yamaguchi; Yasuhiko Futamata; Fumihiro Yoshimura; Naotaka Murakami; Kikuo Koufuji; Rumiko Kutami; Kazuyuki Kojima; Shino Ohki; Seiji Kurata; Hayato Kaida; Masatoshi Ishibashi; Hirohisa Yano
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 8.  FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  K Scheidhauer; C Walter; M D Seemann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Accuracy of (99m)Tc-sestamibi scintimammography for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Sonia Marta Moriguchi; Laurival Antônio DE Luca; Beatriz Lotufo Griva; Kátia Hiromoto Koga; Eduardo Tinois DA Silva; Heloisa DE Luca Vespoli; Gilberto Uemura
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Cancer imaging - making the most of your gamma camera.

Authors:  K A Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.