Literature DB >> 9282178

The value of physical examination in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study.

G W Schurink1, P J Bode, P A van Luijt, A B van Vugt.   

Abstract

Between 1 January 1993 and 1 January 1994, 204 consecutive patients with possible blunt abdominal injury were analysed retrospectively. All patients underwent a standardized diagnostic approach on admission to the emergency room. Abdominal ultrasound (AUS) was performed in all cases. If there was evidence of intra-abdominal injury on physical examination or AUS, without signs of persistent hypovolaemia after initial assessment, contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scanning (CECT) of the abdomen was carried out without exception. Physical examination was equivocal in 13 and 3 per cent, respectively, of patients with 'isolated' abdominal trauma (N = 23) or with fractures of lower ribs 7-12 as a sole diagnosis (N = 30). In multiple injury patients (N = 95) or those with suspected 'isolated' head injury (N = 56), these figures reached 45 and 84 per cent, respectively. AUS (N = 204) revealed intra-abdominal injury in 20 per cent of patients, and CECT (N = 43) resulted in additional information in 49 per cent. Patients with 'isolated' head injury showed 9 per cent abnormalities on abdominal evaluation versus 32 per cent in multiple injury patients. In lower rib fractures (7-12) in multiple injury patients abdominal injury was diagnosed in 67 per cent of the cases. We conclude that: (1) negative findings following reliable physical examination of patients with 'isolated' head injury show very high values (NPV 100 per cent), but reliable physical examination is very infrequent (16 per cent); (2) NPV in lower rib fractures due to low energy impact is very high (100 per cent), with a reliable physical examination in most patients (97 per cent); (3) in patients with isolated abdominal trauma 87 per cent have a reliable physical examination with a moderately high NPV (71 per cent); (4) almost half the multiple injury patients have an unequivocal physical examination (45 per cent), with a high NPV following reliable physical examination for abdominal injury (85 per cent); (5) abdominal ultrasonography should be the first step in the radiological assessment of all patients with possible blunt abdominal injury; (6) in multiply injured patients with fractures of their lower ribs (7-12) due to high energy impact the incidence of abdominal injury is very high and CECT might be indicated even in the case of normal AUS findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9282178     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(97)00007-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  24 in total

1.  Combined head and abdominal computed tomography for blunt trauma: which patients with minor head trauma benefit most?

Authors:  Sarah R Wu; Shamim Shakibai; John P McGahan; John R Richards
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-08-30

Review 2.  From FAST to E-FAST: an overview of the evolution of ultrasound-based traumatic injury assessment.

Authors:  J Montoya; S P Stawicki; D C Evans; D P Bahner; S Sparks; R P Sharpe; J Cipolla
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography.

Authors:  Afshin Mohammadi; Mohammad Ghasemi-Rad
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Iterative reconstruction improves image quality and preserves diagnostic accuracy in the setting of blunt solid organ injuries.

Authors:  Scott D Steenburg; Scott Persohn; Changyu Shen; Jeff W Dunkle; Sean D Gussick; Matthew J Petersen; Amy Wisnewski-Rhodes; Ryan T Whitesell
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-06-07

5.  Automatic tube current modulation for whole-body polytrauma CT with immobilization devices: is there an increase in radiation dose and degradation of image quality?

Authors:  André Euler; Bram Stieltjes; Sebastian T Schindera
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-09-10

Review 6.  [Current diagnostics for intra-abdominal trauma].

Authors:  D Nast-Kolb; H J Bail; G Taeger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Controversies in emergency radiology. CT versus ultrasound in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  James T Rhea; Daniel H Garza; Robert A Novelline
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-03-23

8.  Pancreatic laceration in a female collegiate soccer athlete: a case report.

Authors:  Michael E Powers; Michelle Tropeano; Diana Priestman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  [Shock trauma room diagnosis: initial diagnosis after blunt abdominal trauma. A review of the literature].

Authors:  T Lindner; H J Bail; S Manegold; U Stöckle; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Prehospital and Emergency Department Ultrasound in Blunt Abdominal Trauma.

Authors:  Miriam Ruesseler; Thomas Kirschning; Raoul Breitkreutz; Ingo Marzi; Felix Walcher
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.