Literature DB >> 9276702

Abdominoperineal resection via total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve preservation for low rectal cancer.

W E Enker1, K Havenga, T Polyak, H Thaler, M Cranor.   

Abstract

We have examined the results of abdominoperineal resection (APR) for primary cancer of the rectum performed in accordance with the principles of total mesorectal excision (TME) and autonomic nerve preservation (ANP). TME is defined as sharp pelvic dissection under direct vision between the parietal and visceral planes of the pelvic fascia. TME results in the resection of all mesorectal disease with intact, negative lateral or circumferential margins of resection. Statistical analysis was done of survival, local recurrence, and both sexual and urinary functions in a prospective database of consecutive patients. Operative mortality was 2% (3/148) due to cardiac disease. Overall survival was 60%, significantly worse than consecutive patients from the same database who were able to undergo sphincter preservation (81%) (p = 0.0003). Poorer survival was statistically related to the presence of positive lymph nodes (p = 0.0009). Overall, local recurrence rates were 5% (8/148) in patients without distant metastases, and 15% to 21% in patients with positive nodes. Positive lymph nodes, N2 disease, lymphatic vascular invasion, and perineural invasion were independent significant risk factors for local recurrence. Sexual function was preserved in approximately 57% of patients undergoing APR versus 85% of patients undergoing sphincter preservation. No significant urinary morbidity was encountered. Low rectal cancer requiring APR seems to be a disease with more locally advanced disease and adverse pathologic features than are seen with mid-rectal cancers treatable by low anterior resection. APR when performed in accordance with the principles of TME and ANP ensures the greatest likelihood of resecting all regional disease while preserving both sexual and urinary functions. Preoperative combined modality treatment may be warranted in all T3 or greater low rectal cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9276702     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  34 in total

1.  Effect of extended radical resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Xing-Shu Dong; Hai-Tao Xu; Zhi-Wei Yu; Ming Liu; Bin-Bin Cu; Peng Zhao; Xi-Shan Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Transanal endoscopic video-assisted (TEVA) excision.

Authors:  Madhu Ragupathi; Dominique Vande Maele; Javier Nieto; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Neuro-anatomy of the posterior parametrium and surgical considerations for a nerve-sparing approach in radical pelvic surgery.

Authors:  Marcello Ceccaroni; Roberto Clarizia; Giovanni Roviglione; Giacomo Ruffo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Quality of life in non-early rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Alessandro M Paganini; Andrea Balla; Silvia Quaresima; Pietro Ursi; Paolo Bruzzone; Andrea Picchetto; Fabrizio I Mattei; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effects of robotic rectal surgery on sexual and urinary functions in male patients.

Authors:  Shinji Ozeki; Kotaro Maeda; Tsunekazu Hanai; Koji Masumori; Hidetoshi Katsuno; Hiroshi Takahashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Chang S Yu; Seok B Lim; Chan W Kim; Jong H Kim; Tae W Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Development and progression of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Upender Manne; Chandrakumar Shanmugam; Venkat R Katkoori; Harvey L Bumpers; William E Grizzle
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 8.  Sphincter saving rectum resection is the standard procedure for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Di Betta; A D'Hoore; L Filez; F Penninckx
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison.

Authors:  Soo Yeun Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Jun Seok Park; Hye Jin Kim; Jong-Pil Ryuk; Sung-Hwan Yun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Long-term results of transanal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for T2 and T3 adenocarcinomas of the rectum.

Authors:  Rajesh M Nair; Erin M Siegel; Dung-Tsa Chen; William J Fulp; Timothy J Yeatman; Mokenge P Malafa; Jorge Marcet; David Shibata
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.