Literature DB >> 9276361

Carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix treated with radiotherapy alone: a French cooperative study: update and multivariate analysis of prognostics factors.

I Barillot1, J C Horiot, J Pigneux, S Schraub, H Pourquier, N Daly, M Bolla, R Rozan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine independent prognostic factors in a group of 1875 patients with invasive carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix treated with radiotherapy alone in a French cooperative study from 1970 to 1993.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were staged according to the UICC-FIGO and MDAH substaging. The distribution per FIGO stage was Ia-Ib: 25.5%; IIa: 12%; IIb: 29%; IIIa: 5%; IIIb: 25%, and IV: 3.5%. Ninety-two percent had squamous cell carcinoma. The maximum diameter of the clinically detectable cervical disease was less than 3 cm in 24.5% of Stages I-II and in 10% of Stages III-IV, more than 5 cm in 13.5% of Stages I-II, and in 16% of Stages III-IV. Nodal involvement was shown on lymphangiogram in 16% of Stages I-II and in 32.5% of Stages III-IV.
RESULTS: 1) Univariate analysis of Stages I and II: stage, cervical disease diameter, and nodal involvement are significant prognostic factors. Five-year specific survival rate (5ySS) is 83.5% in Stage Ib, 81% in IIa and 71% in IIb. Five-year disease-free survival rate (5yDFS) is 86% in tumors less of 3 cm, 76% in tumors of 3 to 5 cm, and 61.5% in tumor larger than 5 cm. Lymphangiogram strongly influences the 5-year pelvic disease-free survival rate (5yPDFS): respectively, 90% in nonpositive lymphangiogram vs. 65% when positive. A significant drop in specific and disease-free survival is observed (10 and 14%, respectively (p = 0.04) when comparing adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Age is a significant prognostic factor for specific survival because patients aged less than 30 years old have 91% vs. about 75% for patients over 30 years (p = 0.03). 2) Univariate analysis of Stages III-IV: Stage and positive lymphangiogram are predictive factors for relapse and death. The MDAH substaging is more reliable to predict the probability of pelvic disease-free survival in Stage III. At 5 years, the FIGO Stages IIIa and IIIb have a rather similar PDFS (65% vs. 59%). Conversely, the difference of survival rates between MDAH Stage IIIA and Stage IIIB is more demonstrative (69% vs. 47.5%). 3) Multivariate analysis (Cox P. H. R. model). Nodal involvement and stage remain significant for all three models in all stages (p < 0.0001). Age above 70 years influences specific survival for Stage I-II (p = 0.01). Tumors larger than 5 cm and adenocarcinoma also appear to be independent prognostic factors for specific and disease-free survival in Stage I-II (p = 0.05 and p = 0.005, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The relevance of tumor size (less or greater than 4 cm) is now recognized in the 1995 revised FIGO staging in Stage Ib but unfortunately not in other stages. Tumor size per stage and nodal status should be systematically recorded to allow a better prediction of failure rates and to compare literature reports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9276361     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00145-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  20 in total

1.  Evidence based radiation oncology with existing technology.

Authors:  Nicolas Isa
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-10-14

Review 2.  A review of recent developments in image-guided radiation therapy in cervix cancer.

Authors:  Azmat H Sadozye; Nicholas Reed
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Weekly Cisplatin and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Radical Treatment of Advanced Cervical Cancer in Elderly Patients: Feasibility and Clinical Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Rosario Mazzola; Francesco Ricchetti; Alba Fiorentino; Niccolò Giaj Levra; Sergio Fersino; Gioacchino Di Paola; Ruggero Ruggieri; Filippo Alongi
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-08

4.  Oncostatin M treatment increases the responsiveness toward cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer cells in a STAT3-dependent manner.

Authors:  Russalina Stroeder; Barbara Walch-Rückheim; Jil Fischbach; Ingolf Juhasz-Böss; Christian Rübe; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Sigrun Smola
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Residual tumour volumes and grey zones after external beam radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) in cervical cancer patients. A low-field MRI study.

Authors:  M P Schmid; B Mansmann; M Federico; J C A Dimopoulous; P Georg; E Fidarova; W Dörr; R Pötter
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Radiotherapy versus concurrent 5-day cisplatin and radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Long-term results of a phase III randomized trial.

Authors:  Viorica Nagy; Ovidiu Coza; Claudia Ordeanu; Alexandru Trăilă; Alin Rancea; Nicolae Todor; Nicolae Ghilezan
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Significant impact on the oncologic outcomes with intensity modulated radiotherapy and conformational radiotherapy over conventional radiotherapy in cervix cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gustavo Arruda Viani; Fred Muller Dos Santos; Juliana Fernandes Pavoni
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-06-07

8.  Sociodemographic factors and delay in the diagnosis of cervical cancer in Morocco.

Authors:  Mohamed Berraho; Majdouline Obtel; Karima Bendahhou; Ahmed Zidouh; Hassan Errihani; Abdellatif Benider; Chakib Nejjari
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2012-05-25

9.  Permanent interstitial re-irradiation with Au-198 seeds in patients with post-radiation locally recurrent uterine carcinoma.

Authors:  Kaori Okazawa; Keiko Yuasa-Nakagawa; Ryo-Ichi Yoshimura; Hitoshi Shibuya
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 10.  High dose rate versus low dose rate intracavity brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervix cancer.

Authors:  Ruifeng Liu; XiaoHu Wang; Jin Hui Tian; KeHu Yang; Jun Wang; Lei Jiang; Xiang Yong Hao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.