Literature DB >> 9276357

Androgen suppression plus radiation versus radiation alone for patients with D1 (pN+) adenocarcinoma of the prostate (results based on a national prospective randomized trial, RTOG 85-31). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

C A Lawton1, K Winter, R Byhardt, W T Sause, G E Hanks, A H Russell, M Rotman, A Porter, D G McGowan, J D DelRowe, M V Pilepich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of immediate androgen suppression in conjunction with standard external beam irradiation vs. radiation alone on a group of pathologically staged lymph node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A national prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-31) of standard external beam irradiation plus immediate androgen suppression vs. external beam irradiation alone was initiated in 1985 for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. One hundred seventy-three of the patients in this trial had biopsy-proven pathologically involved lymph nodes. Ninety-eight of these patients received radiation plus the immediate androgen suppression (LHRH agonist), while 75 received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at the time of relapse.
RESULTS: With a median followup of 4.9 years, estimated progression-free survival with PSA < 1.5 ng/ml at 5 years was 55% for the patients who received radiation plus immediate LHRH agonist vs. 11% of the patients who received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation at relapse (p = 0.0001). Because all of these patients had locally advanced disease (i.e., pathologically positive lymph nodes), stage does not explain this difference in outcome, and Gleason grade was not statistically different between the two groups. Estimated absolute survival at 5 years for the radiation and LHRH group was 73 vs. 65% for the radiation alone group who received androgen suppression at relapse. Estimated disease-specific survival at 5 years was 82% for the radiation and immediate LHRH agonist group and 77% for the radiation-alone group.
CONCLUSION: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate and pathologically involved pelvic lymph nodes (pN+ or clinical stage D1) should be seriously considered for external beam irradiation plus immediate hormonal manipulation over radiation alone with hormonal manipulation at the time of relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9276357     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00288-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

Review 1.  External beam radiation therapy: role of androgen deprivation.

Authors:  Patrick Kupelian
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The effect of concurrent androgen deprivation and 3D conformal radiotherapy on prostate volume and clinical organ doses during treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Onal; E Topkan; E Efe; M Yavuz; G Arslan; A Yavuz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  [Therapy of nodal positive prostatic carcinoma: when should hormone therapy be started?].

Authors:  D Zierhut
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Breast cancer clinical and translational research: analogies and implications for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lea Baer; Silvia C Formenti
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

Review 5.  Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Kumar; M Shelley; C Harrison; B Coles; T J Wilt; M D Mason
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

6.  Early versus deferred standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Katrin Jensen; Mariona Pinart; Andreas Kahlmeyer; Stefanie Schmidt; Carrie L Price; Verena Lieb; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-11

Review 7.  Early versus deferred androgen suppression therapy for patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Bastian Keck; Gerta Rücker; Edith Motschall; Bernd Wullich; Gerd Antes; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Efficacy and toxicity of external-beam radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Z Zhu; J Zhang; Y Liu; M Chen; P Guo; K Li
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Favorable outcomes in locally advanced and node positive prostate cancer patients treated with combined pelvic IMRT and androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lilleby; Amol Narrang; Gunnar Tafjord; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Kjell Magne Russnes; Andreas Stensvold; Knut Håkon Hole; Phuoc Tran; Karsten Eilertsen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.