Literature DB >> 31194882

Early versus deferred standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Frank Kunath1, Katrin Jensen, Mariona Pinart, Andreas Kahlmeyer, Stefanie Schmidt, Carrie L Price, Verena Lieb, Philipp Dahm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard androgen suppression therapy (AST) using surgical or medical castration is considered a mainstay of advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treatment. AST can be initiated early when disease is asymptomatic or deferred when patients suffer symptoms of disseminated prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of early versus deferred standard AST for advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. SEARCH
METHODS: For this Cochrane Review update, we performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science; last searched November 2018) and two clinical trial registers, with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status. We also searched bibliographies of included studies and conference proceedings (last searched January 2019). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a direct comparison of early versus deferred standard AST. We excluded all other study designs. Participants included had advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer receiving surgical or medical castration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently classified studies and abstracted data. The primary outcomes were time to death of any cause and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were time to disease progression, time to death from prostate cancer, adverse events and quality of life. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the certainty of evidence according to GRADE. We performed subgroup analyses for advanced but non-metastatic disease (T2-4/N+ M0), metastatic disease (M1), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse. MAIN
RESULTS: We identified seven new RCTs since publication of the original review in 2002. In total, we included 10 RCTs.Primary outcomesEarly AST probably reduces the risk of death from any cause over time (hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 0.90; moderate-certainty evidence; 4767 participants). This corresponds to 57 fewer deaths (95% CI 80 fewer to 31 fewer) per 1000 participants at 5 years for the moderate risk group and 23 fewer deaths (95% CI 32 fewer to 13 fewer) per 1000 participants at 5 years in the low risk group. We downgraded for study limitations. Early versus deferred AST may have little or no effect on serious adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.16; low-certainty evidence; 10,575 participants) which corresponds to 6 more serious adverse events (6 fewer to 18 more) per 1000 participants. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and selective reporting.Secondary outcomesEarly AST probably reduces the risk of death from prostate cancer over time (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84; moderate-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 62 fewer prostate cancer deaths per 1000 (95% CI 87 fewer to 31 fewer) at 5 years for the moderate risk group and 24 fewer death from prostate cancer (95% CI 34 fewer to 12 fewer) per 1000 men at 5 years in the low risk group. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations.Early AST may decrease the rate of skeletal events (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.80; low-certainty evidence) corresponding to 23 fewer skeletal events per 1000 (95% CI 31 fewer to 7 fewer). We downgraded for study limitations and imprecision. It may also increase fatigue (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.62; low-certainty evidence), corresponding to 31 more men with this complaint per 1000 (95% CI 18 more to 48 more). We downgraded for study limitations and imprecision. It may increase the risk of heart failure (RR 1.90, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.33; low-certainty evidence) corresponding to 27 more events per 1000 (95% CI 3 more to 69 more). We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and imprecision.Global quality of life is probably similar after two years as assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire (mean difference -1.56, 95% CI -4.50 to 1.38; moderate-certainty evidence) with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Early AST probably extends time to death of any cause and time to death from prostate cancer. It may slightly decrease the rate of skeletal events. Rates of serious adverse events and quality of life may be similar. It may increase fatigue and may increase the risk of heart failure. Better quality trials would be particularly important to better understand the outcomes related to possible treatment-related harm, for which we only found low-certainty evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31194882      PMCID: PMC6564091          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003506.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  111 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Immediate versus deferred androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: the jury is still out.

Authors:  Alexandre R Zlotta; Claude Schulman
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2006-09

3.  [When to begin with androgen deprivation?].

Authors:  A Bex; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Bicalutamide ('Casodex') 150 mg as adjuvant to radiotherapy in patients with localised or locally advanced prostate cancer: results from the randomised Early Prostate Cancer Programme.

Authors:  Chris J Tyrrell; Heather Payne; William A See; David G McLeod; Manfred P Wirth; Peter Iversen; Jon Armstrong; Clive Morris
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  E M Messing; J Manola; M Sarosdy; G Wilding; E D Crawford; D Trump
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  The 'Timing of Androgen-Deprivation therapy in incurable prostate cancer' protocol (TOAD)--where are we now? Synopsis of the Victorian Cooperative Oncology Group PR 01-03 and Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 03.06 clinical trial.

Authors:  Gillian M Duchesne; Henry H Woo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Androgen suppression plus radiation versus radiation alone for patients with stage D1/pathologic node-positive adenocarcinoma of the prostate: updated results based on national prospective randomized trial Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31.

Authors:  Colleen A Lawton; Kathryn Winter; David Grignon; Miljenko V Pilepich
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Bicalutamide (Casodex) 150 mg plus standard care in early non-metastatic prostate cancer: results from Early Prostate Cancer Trial 24 at a median 7 years' follow-up.

Authors:  M Wirth; C Tyrrell; K Delaere; M Sánchez-Chapado; J Ramon; D M A Wallace; J Hetherington; F Pina; C F Heyns; S Navani; J Armstrong
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial.

Authors:  Michel Bolla; Laurence Collette; Léo Blank; Padraig Warde; Jean Bernard Dubois; René-Olivier Mirimanoff; Guy Storme; Jacques Bernier; Abraham Kuten; Cora Sternberg; Johan Mattelaer; José Lopez Torecilla; J Rafael Pfeffer; Carmel Lino Cutajar; Alfredo Zurlo; Marianne Pierart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-07-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Androgen suppression and radiation vs radiation alone for prostate cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Ming-Hui Chen; Andrew A Renshaw; Marian Loffredo; Philip W Kantoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Oxidative stress and redox signaling in CRPC progression: therapeutic potential of clinically-tested Nrf2-activators.

Authors:  Debasis Mondal; Devin Narwani; Shahnawaz Notta; Dawood Ghaffar; Nikhil Mardhekar; Syed S A Quadri
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2021-03-19

2.  New insights in the paradigm of upregulation of tumoral PSMA expression by androgen receptor blockade: Enzalutamide induces PSMA upregulation in castration-resistant prostate cancer even in patients having previously progressed on enzalutamide.

Authors:  Florian Rosar; Sebastian Dewes; Martin Ries; Andrea Schaefer; Fadi Khreish; Stephan Maus; Hendrik Bohnenberger; Johannes Linxweiler; Mark Bartholomä; Carsten Ohlmann; Samer Ezziddin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Combining abbreviated literature searches with single-reviewer screening: three case studies of rapid reviews.

Authors:  Lisa Affengruber; Gernot Wagner; Siw Waffenschmidt; Stefan K Lhachimi; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Kylie Thaler; Ursula Griebler; Irma Klerings; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-18

4.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for the Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer in Australia.

Authors:  Rachel Song; Varinder Jeet; Rajan Sharma; Martin Hoyle; Bonny Parkinson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.558

5.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer (2020).

Authors:  A González Del Alba; M J Méndez-Vidal; S Vazquez; E Castro; M A Climent; E Gallardo; E Gonzalez-Billalabeitia; D Lorente; J P Maroto; J A Arranz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.405

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.