Literature DB >> 9274408

High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma.

M C Westcott1, A I McNaught, D P Crabb, F W Fitzke, R A Hitchings.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Automated perimetry is of fundamental importance in assessing visual function in glaucoma. A technique was evaluated to perform high spatial resolution automated perimetry to allow a more detailed assessment of the luminance sensitivity in selected regions of the visual field than is possible with conventional perimetry.
METHOD: High spatial resolution perimetry was performed using a Humphrey automated perimeter by measuring luminance sensitivity across a 9 by 9 degree custom grid of 100 test locations with a separation between adjacent locations of 1 degree. Quantitative analysis of the raw and Gaussian filtered thresholds was performed to assess the repeatability of the technique in normals, glaucoma suspects, and glaucoma patients.
RESULTS: The testing protocol was well tolerated by all subjects. High spatial resolution perimetry in glaucomatous eyes demonstrated fine luminance sensitivity loss not suspected with conventional perimetry. High spatial resolution perimetry also demonstrated reproducible areas of sensitivity loss in some glaucomatous eyes in areas of the visual field which appear normal with conventional programmes. The repeatability of the technique correlated with mean threshold sensitivity and was substantially improved to clinically acceptable levels by Gaussian filtering the thresholds.
CONCLUSION: This technique of high spatial resolution perimetry allows the practical assessment of selected regions of the visual field at higher resolution than conventional perimetry, and may be clinically useful in glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9274408      PMCID: PMC1722228          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.81.6.452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  22 in total

1.  Repeatability, reproducibility and intersession variability of the Allergan Humphrey ultrasonic biometer.

Authors:  A R Rudnicka; C F Steele; D P Crabb; D F Edgar
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1992-06

2.  Angioscotomata and morphological features of related vessels in automated perimetry.

Authors:  A B Safran; A Halfon; E Safran; C Mermoud
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Variability of glaucomatous visual field defects in computerized perimetry.

Authors:  C Holmin; C E Krakau
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-06-15

4.  Variability of static visual threshold responses in patients with elevated IOPs.

Authors:  E B Werner; N Saheb; D Thomas
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-10

5.  Image processing of computerised visual field data.

Authors:  F W Fitzke; D P Crabb; A I McNaught; D F Edgar; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Nerve fiber layer defects with normal visual fields. Do normal optic disc and normal visual field indicate absence of glaucomatous abnormality?

Authors:  A Tuulonen; J Lehtola; P J Airaksinen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.

Authors:  S D Smith; J Katz; H A Quigley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Visual field and retinal nerve fibre layer in early glaucoma after optic disc haemorrhage.

Authors:  P J Airaksinen; A Heijl
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1983-04

9.  Long-term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  C Migdal; W Gregory; R Hitchings
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Perimetric point density and detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.

Authors:  A Heijl
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1993-08
View more
  11 in total

1.  Structural and functional assessment by hemispheric asymmetry testing of the macular region in preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Chiaki Kawaguchi; Yusuke Nakatani; Shinji Ohkubo; Tomomi Higashide; Ichiro Kawaguchi; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Monitoring Glaucomatous Functional Loss Using an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Dashboard.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Tobias Elze; Louis R Pasquale; Osamah Saeedi; Mengyu Wang; Lucy Q Shen; Sarah R Wellik; Carlos G De Moraes; Jonathan S Myers; Michael V Boland
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Detection of visual field defects in pre-perimetric glaucoma using fundus-oriented small-target perimetry.

Authors:  Yusuke Nakatani; Shinji Ohkubo; Tomomi Higashide; Aiko Iwase; Kazutaka Kani; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Use of high spatial resolution perimetry to identify scotomata not apparent with conventional perimetry in the nasal field of glaucomatous subjects.

Authors:  M C Westcott; D F Garway-Heath; F W Fitzke; D Kamal; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Modeling the relative influence of fixation and sampling errors on retest variability in perimetry.

Authors:  T Maddess
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Applying a New Automated Perimetry Pattern Based on the Stimulus Distribution of the Multifocal ERG to Improve Structure-Function Investigation in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Lívia M Brandão; Matthias Monhart; Andreas Schötzau; Anna A Ledolter; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry.

Authors:  Takuya Numata; Ted Maddess; Chota Matsumoto; Sachiko Okuyama; Shigeki Hashimoto; Hiroki Nomoto; Yoshikazu Shimomura
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Specification of progression in glaucomatous visual field loss, applying locally condensed stimulus arrangements.

Authors:  Jukka Nevalainen; Jens Paetzold; Eleni Papageorgiou; Pamela A Sample; John P Pascual; Elke Krapp; Bettina Selig; Reinhard Vonthein; Ulrich Schiefer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Persistence, spatial distribution and implications for progression detection of blind parts of the visual field in glaucoma: a clinical cohort study.

Authors:  Francisco G Junoy Montolio; Christiaan Wesselink; Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Incorporating Spatial Models in Visual Field Test Procedures.

Authors:  Nikki J Rubinstein; Allison M McKendrick; Andrew Turpin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.