Literature DB >> 9274077

A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone.

A Wennerberg1, A Ektessabi, T Albrektsson, C Johansson, B Andersson.   

Abstract

Screw-shaped implants were prepared with three different surface topographies: One was left as machined, ie, a turned surface, and two were blasted surfaces with differing degrees of surface roughness. The surface topography was measured with a confocal laser scanning profilometer and the surface roughness was characterized using height and spatial descriptive parameters. The turned surface had an average surface roughness of 0.96 micron and an average peak spacing of 8.6 microns. The two blasted surfaces had surface roughness values of 1.16 microns and 1.94 microns, respectively; the corresponding values for the peak spacing parameter were 10.00 microns and 13.22 microns, respectively. After 1 year in rabbit bone, the bone response to the turned implants was compared with the response to the two blasted implant surfaces. Firmer bone fixation was found for the two blasted surfaces, with statistically significant increases in removal torque and percentage of bone-to-metal contact. Furthermore, about 2 mm from the implant surface, the titanium release was similar for the turned and the 25-micron aluminum oxide-blasted implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9274077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  28 in total

1.  Surface characterization and biological evaluation of spark-eroded surfaces.

Authors:  A Wennerberg; C Hallgren; C Johansson; T Sawase; J Lausmaa
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Biological behavior of sol-gel coated dental implants.

Authors:  P A Ramires; A Wennerberg; C B Johansson; F Cosentino; S Tundo; E Milella
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Dental implant surfaces after insertion in bone: an in vitro study in four commercial implant systems.

Authors:  Herbert Deppe; Carolina Wolff; Florian Bauer; Ricarda Ruthenberg; Anton Sculean; Thomas Mücke
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Bone-titanium oxide interface in humans revealed by transmission electron microscopy and electron tomography.

Authors:  Anders Palmquist; Kathryn Grandfield; Birgitta Norlindh; Torsten Mattsson; Rickard Brånemark; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite coatings on dental screws: effects of blast coating process and biological response.

Authors:  Conor F Dunne; Barry Twomey; Ciara Kelly; Jeremy C Simpson; Kenneth T Stanton
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Comparison of physical, chemical and cellular responses to nano- and micro-sized calcium silicate/poly(epsilon-caprolactone) bioactive composites.

Authors:  Jie Wei; S J Heo; D H Kim; S E Kim; Y T Hyun; Jung-Woog Shin
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  In vitro cellular response to titanium electrochemically coated with hydroxyapatite compared to titanium with three different levels of surface roughness.

Authors:  Marcelo H Prado Da Silva; Gloria D A Soares; Carlos N Elias; Serena M Best; Iain R Gibson; Lucy DiSilvio; Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  The effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation on hydroxyapatite-coated implants and fluoride-modified TiO2-blasted implant surfaces: a microstructural analysis.

Authors:  Seung-Il Shin; Eun-Kwon Lee; Jeong-Hyun Kim; Ji-Hun Lee; Sun-Hee Kim; Young-Hyuk Kwon; Yeek Herr; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography.

Authors:  G Zhao; A L Raines; M Wieland; Z Schwartz; B D Boyan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Surface modification of biomedical and dental implants and the processes of inflammation, wound healing and bone formation.

Authors:  Clark M Stanford
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.