Literature DB >> 9273381

Loose-hinge total elbow arthroplasty. An experimental study of the effects of implant alignment on three-dimensional elbow kinematics.

F Schuind1, S O'Driscoll, S Korinek, K N An, B F Morrey.   

Abstract

A previous study suggested that the kinematics of a loose-hinge total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) are those of a truly semiconstrained joint. This study addresses the effects of malposition of the implant. The three-dimensional elbow kinematics during simulated active motion were studied in six cadaver specimens using an electromagnetic tracking device. In addition to simulated active elbow flexion, flexion arcs were obtained under an elbow varus or valgus moment, to calculate the structural varus-valgus laxities. The results after four different Coondrad-Morrey TEA positions of implantation were compared with those of the intact elbow. The flexion-extension amplitudes were not significantly decreased after TEA implantation, except with external rotation of the ulnar component, which resulted in a loss of extension. In the intact elbow and after TEA implantation in any position, the mean varus-valgus deviations throughout elbow flexion were in a narrower range than the structural limits imposed by the ligaments (intact elbow) or the TEA hinge design. With internal malrotation of the humeral component over 10 degrees, however, the valgus structural limit was reached and, conversely, the varus limit with external rotation over 10 degrees. The clinical improvement observed with the semiconstrained TEA is derived from the benefits of the less constrained articulation. The proximodistal changes of TEA implantation have no consequence on the kinematic pattern. Rotational malpositioning of either humeral or ulnar component should be avoided, the first because it changes the kinematic pattern toward the structural limits of the implant and, therefore, may lead to excessive stresses at the bone-cement-implant interfaces and to early loosening, and the latter because it causes loss of extension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9273381     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80214-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  Semi-automated stereoradiographic upper limb 3D reconstructions using a combined parametric and statistical model: a preliminary study.

Authors:  F Lebailly; L V P C Lima; A Clairemidi; B Aubert; S Guerard; Y Chaibi; J de Guise; C Fontaine; W Skalli
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of total elbow arthroplasty using fluoroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Kazuma Futai; Tetsuya Tomita; Takaharu Yamazaki; Tsuyoshi Murase; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Triceps on approach for total elbow arthroplasty: worth preserving? A review of approaches for total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon J Booker; Chris D Smith
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-12-13

Review 4.  What design and material factors impact the wear and corrosion performance in total elbow arthroplasties?

Authors:  Mark P Figgie; Timothy M Wright; Denise Drinkwater
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Linked semi-constrained total elbow prosthesis in chronic arthritis: results of 18 cases.

Authors:  Maurizio Corradi; Marco Frattini; Bruno Panno; Silvio Tocco; Francesco Pogliacomi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2010-05

6.  The anconeus-triceps lateral flap approach for total elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A Celli; P Bonucci
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-11-30

7.  Why the elbow? My experience and perspective.

Authors:  Bernard Morrey
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-06-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.