Literature DB >> 9271963

A randomized controlled study of birth center care versus standard maternity care: effects on women's health.

U Waldenström1, C A Nilsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety of birth center care for low-risk women is an important issue, but it has not yet been studied in randomized controlled trials. Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of birth center care on women's health during pregnancy, birth, and 2 months postpartum by comparing the outcomes with those of women experiencing standard maternity care in the greater Stockholm area.
METHODS: Of 1860 women, 928 were randomly allocated to birth center care and 932 to standard antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care. Information about medical procedures and health outcomes was collected from clinical records, and a questionnaire was mailed to women 2 months after the birth. Analysis was by "intention to treat;" that is, all antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum transfers were included in the birth center group.
RESULTS: During pregnancy, birth center women made fewer visits to midwives and doctors, experienced fewer tests, and reported fewer health problems. No statistical difference occurred in hospital admissions (4.8%) compared with the control group (4.7%). During labor, birth center women used more alternative birth positions, had longer labors, and did not differ in perineal lacerations. In both groups 1.7 percent of women developed complications, requiring more than 7 days of hospital care after the birth. During the first 2 postpartum months, about 20 percent of women in both groups saw a doctor for similar types of health problems, and no statistical difference occurred in hospital readmissions, 1.4 and 0.8 percent in the birth center and control groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that birth center care is effective in identifying significant maternal complications and as safe for women as standard maternity care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9271963     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1997.tb00332.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  10 in total

1.  Post natal use of analgesics: comparisons between conventional postnatal wards and a maternity hotel.

Authors:  Hedvig Nordeng; Anne Eskild; Britt-Ingjerd Nesheim
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-02-10

2.  Physician-led, hospital-linked, birth care centers can decrease cesarean section rates without increasing rates of adverse events.

Authors:  Margaret H O'Hara; Linda M Frazier; Travis W Stembridge; Robert S McKay; Sandra N Mohr; Stuart L Shalat
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 3.  Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth.

Authors:  Ellen D Hodnett; Soo Downe; Denis Walsh
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

4.  High-risk pregnancy: postpartum rehospitalization.

Authors:  Margaret S Hamilton; Dorothy Brooten; JoAnne M Youngblut
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2002 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on the level of birth care? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S Bernitz; R Rolland; E Blix; M Jacobsen; K Sjøborg; P Øian
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 6.  Midwifery-led antenatal care models: mapping a systematic review to an evidence-based quality framework to identify key components and characteristics of care.

Authors:  Andrew Symon; Jan Pringle; Helen Cheyne; Soo Downe; Vanora Hundley; Elaine Lee; Fiona Lynn; Alison McFadden; Jenny McNeill; Mary J Renfrew; Mary Ross-Davie; Edwin van Teijlingen; Heather Whitford; Fiona Alderdice
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Two Alternative Models of Maternity Care in Ireland.

Authors:  Christopher G Fawsitt; Jane Bourke; Aileen Murphy; Brendan McElroy; Jennifer E Lutomski; Rosemary Murphy; Richard A Greene
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.561

8.  Defining and describing birth centres in the Netherlands - a component study of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.

Authors:  M A A Hermus; I C Boesveld; M Hitzert; A Franx; J P de Graaf; E A P Steegers; T A Wiegers; K M van der Pal-de Bruin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Births in two different delivery units in the same clinic--a prospective study of healthy primiparous women.

Authors:  Britt Ingeborg Eide; Anne Britt Vika Nilsen; Svein Rasmussen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Hora Soltani; Simon Gates; Andrew Shennan; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.