Literature DB >> 9271717

Letting the deaf be deaf. Reconsidering the use of cochlear implants in prelingually deaf children.

R A Crouch1.   

Abstract

In theory, cochlear implants hold out the possibility of enabling profoundly prelingually deaf children to hear. For these children's parents, who are usually hearing, this possibility is a great relief. Yet the decision to have this prosthetic device implanted ought not to be viewed as an easy or obvious one. Implant efficacy is modest and the burdens associated with them can be great. Moreover, the decision to forgo cochlear implantation for one's child, far from condemning her to a world of meaningless silence, opens the child up to membership in the Deaf community, which has a rich history, language, and value system of its own.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9271717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  15 in total

1.  A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids.

Authors:  J B Tomblin; L Spencer; S Flock; R Tyler; B Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The ethics of assessing health technologies.

Authors:  G J Van der Wilt; R Reuzel; H D Banta
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2000-01

3.  Implant ethics.

Authors:  S O Hansson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  R Nunes
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-08

5.  Enhancement technology and outcomes: what professionals and researchers can learn from those skeptical about cochlear implants.

Authors:  Patrick Kermit
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-12

6.  Cochlear Implantation, Enhancements, Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Some Human Questions.

Authors:  Joseph Lee
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Cancer prevention knowledge of people with profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Philip Zazove; Helen E Meador; Barbara D Reed; Ananda Sen; Daniel W Gorenflo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Growing up with a cochlear implant: education, vocation, and affiliation.

Authors:  Linda J Spencer; J Bruce Tomblin; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2012-09-04

9.  Exploring the language and literacy outcomes of pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Linda J Spencer; Brittan A Barker; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Sex selection: some ethical and policy considerations.

Authors:  Eike-Henner W Kluge
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.