Literature DB >> 10927971

The ethics of assessing health technologies.

G J Van der Wilt1, R Reuzel, H D Banta.   

Abstract

Health technology assessment (HTA) consists of the systematic study of the consequences of the introduction or continued use of the technology in a particular context, with the explicit objective to arrive at a judgment of the value or merit of the technology. Ideally, it is aimed at assessing all aspects of a given technology or group of technologies, including non-technical, e.g. socio-ethical, aspects. However, methods for assessing socio-ethical implications of health technology are relatively undeveloped and few mechanisms exist to take action based on the results of such evaluations. Still, the examples of cochlear inplants (CI) and other cases illustrate that HTA is not a matter of merely collecting the facts about a technology. The facts must be plausible and relevant from a particular framework, which is not always shared by different groups. It is here that socio-ethical aspects are encountered. If health technology assessment aims to enhance the accountability of the decision making process regarding funding and use of health technology, it is a major challenge to assessors of health technologies to deal adequately with existing value pluralism. In this respect interactive evaluation may have something to offer.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10927971     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009934700930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  8 in total

Review 1.  Letting the deaf be deaf. Reconsidering the use of cochlear implants in prelingually deaf children.

Authors:  R A Crouch
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Cochlear implants in children: a study of parental stress and adjustment.

Authors:  A L Quittner; J T Steck; R L Rouiller
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1991

3.  Development of capacities of communication and socialization in young deaf children: utility of a common assessment protocol for implanted or hearing aid equipped children.

Authors:  R Dauman; E Debruge; B Carbonnière; S Lautissier-Berger; J Bouyé; V Soriano
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Medical technology assessment and ethics. Ambivalent relations.

Authors:  H A ten Have
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience.

Authors:  N Tye-Murray; L Spencer; G G Woodworth
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-04

6.  Video analysis: a method of assessing changes in preverbal and early linguistic communication after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  D M Tait
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Early communicative behavior in young children receiving cochlear implants: factor analysis of turn-taking and gaze orientation.

Authors:  M E Lutman; D M Tait
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

8.  Outcomes of cochlear implants for New Zealand children and their families.

Authors:  S C Purdy; L L Chard; C A Moran; S A Hodgson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09
  8 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  [Health technology assessment: Critical scientific methods for evaluating the effects of medical interventions].

Authors:  C Wild
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Evidence-Based Decision Making 3: Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Daria O'Reilly; Richard Audas; Kaitryn Campbell; Meredith Vanstone; James M Bowen; Lisa Schwartz; Nazila Assasi; Ron Goeree
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  The value and pitfalls of speculation about science and technology in bioethics: the case of cognitive enhancement.

Authors:  Eric Racine; Tristana Martin Rubio; Jennifer Chandler; Cynthia Forlini; Jayne Lucke
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-08

Review 4.  Health Technology Assessment of pathogen reduction technologies applied to plasma for clinical use.

Authors:  Americo Cicchetti; Alexandra Berrino; Marina Casini; Paola Codella; Giuseppina Facco; Alessandra Fiore; Giuseppe Marano; Marco Marchetti; Emanuela Midolo; Roberta Minacori; Pietro Refolo; Federica Romano; Matteo Ruggeri; Dario Sacchini; Antonio G Spagnolo; Irene Urbina; Stefania Vaglio; Giuliano Grazzini; Giancarlo M Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  Ethical issues of obesity surgery--a health technology assessment.

Authors:  Samuli I Saarni; Heidi Anttila; Suoma E Saarni; Pertti Mustajoki; Vesa Koivukangas; Tuija S Ikonen; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Ethical analysis to improve decision-making on health technologies.

Authors:  Samuli I Saarni; Bjørn Hofmann; Kristian Lampe; Dagmar Lühmann; Marjukka Mäkelä; Marcial Velasco-Garrido; Ilona Autti-Rämö
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Debating the desirability of new biomedical technologies: lessons from the introduction of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marianne Boenink
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-03

8.  Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments.

Authors:  Anna Mae Scott; Björn Hofmann; Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea; Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Lars Sandman; Yvonne Bombard
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2017-03-15

9.  Why not integrate ethics in HTA: identification and assessment of the reasons.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2014-11-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.