Literature DB >> 9269973

Neurological outcome is diminished in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

E D McGahren1, K Mallik, B M Rodgers.   

Abstract

In a series of 61 infants who had congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) treated at our center from 1978 through 1996, 37 of 59 (61%) survived the perioperative period with two infants lost to follow-up. Nine (47%) of 19 infants survived before the introduction of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) into our region in 1986. Since 1986, 28 (70%) of 40 infants survived. Eighteen infants required ECMO, and 12 (75%) survived. A chart review was performed to determine whether infants surviving CDH are suffering from delays in neurological development, and, if so, whether this is attributable to ECMO. Of 12 ECMO survivors, 8 (67%) exhibited functional or anatomic evidence for neurological delay. Of 21 non-ECMO survivors, where adequate follow-up was available to make an assessment of neurological development, five (24%) exhibited evidence for delay. This difference was significant (P < .05, Fisher's Exact test). Of these five infants, three were premature, and one had DiGeorge syndrome. More ECMO survivors required diaphragmatic (67%) and abdominal (67%) patches at the time of diaphragmatic repair than non-ECMO survivors (4% and 12%, respectively; P < .05, Fisher's Exact test). In addition, more ECMO survivors required gastrostomy tube placement for feeding (50%) than non-ECMO survivors (16%; P < .05, Fisher's Exact test). A greater need for Nissen fundoplication in ECMO survivors (42%) than in non-ECMO survivors (12%) approached significance (P = .05, Fisher's Exact test). There were trends toward higher 1 and 5 minute APGAR scores and initial and best preoperative P(O2) in the non-ECMO survivors. A comparison between ECMO survivors who exhibited evidence of neurological delay with those who did not showed no differences in duration of ECMO, incidence of intracranial complications during ECMO, need for gastrostomy tube feeding or Nissen fundoplication, or incidence of carotid artery repair between the two groups. Infants surviving CDH who require ECMO have a greater incidence of neurological delay than those who do not. This is likely because of severity of the presenting illness as reflected by a greater need for diaphragmatic and abdominal patches during diaphragmatic repair, the need for Nissen fundoplication and gastrostomy tube feeding, and a trend toward poor APGAR scores and best preoperative P(O2) levels in these patients. However, there may be characteristics of ECMO, as yet unidentified, that may contribute to this outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9269973     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90685-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  13 in total

1.  Predictors and statistical models in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Germana Casaccia; Lucilla Ravà; Pietro Bagolan; Vincenzo Maria di Ciommo
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  Neurodevelopmental outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Evaluation, predictors and outcome.

Authors:  Enrico Danzer; Stephen S Kim
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2014-08-08

3.  Quantitative MRI study of infant regional brain size following surgery for long-gap esophageal atresia requiring prolonged critical care.

Authors:  Chandler Rebecca Lee Mongerson; Russell William Jennings; David Zurakowski; Dusica Bajic
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.457

4.  Correlation of MRI Brain Injury Findings with Neonatal Clinical Factors in Infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

Authors:  R Radhakrishnan; S Merhar; J Meinzen-Derr; B Haberman; F Y Lim; P Burns; E Zorn; B Kline-Fath
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Cerebral Perfusion After Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion After ECMO Therapy.

Authors:  Claudia Henzler; Frank G Zöllner; Meike Weis; Fabian Zimmer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Katrin Zahn; Thomas Schaible; K Wolfgang Neff
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  The immediate and long-term outcomes of newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Stanley J Crankson; Saud A Al Jadaan; Mohammed A Namshan; Abdullah A Al-Rabeeah; Omar Oda
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Developmental outcomes of children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Gudrun Aspelund; Annette Zygmunt; Charles J H Stolar; George Mychaliska; Jennifer Butcher; Foong-Yen Lim; Teresa Gratton; Douglas Potoka; Kate Brennan; Ken Azarow; Barbara Jackson; Howard Needelman; Timothy Crombleholme; Yuan Zhang; Jimmy Duong; Marc S Arkovitz; Wendy K Chung; Christiana Farkouh
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Perinatal factors associated with poor neurocognitive outcome in early school age congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors.

Authors:  Jennifer R Benjamin; Kathryn E Gustafson; P Brian Smith; Kirsten M Ellingsen; K Brooke Tompkins; Ronald N Goldberg; C Michael Cotten; Ricki F Goldstein
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 9.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: current status and review of the literature.

Authors:  Anthony S de Buys Roessingh; Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 10.  The long-term follow-up of patients with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a broad spectrum of morbidity.

Authors:  M G Peetsold; H A Heij; C M F Kneepkens; A F Nagelkerke; J Huisman; R J B J Gemke
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.