OBJECTIVE: During surgery, computers can be of great use to support the anesthesiologist in providing task automation. In this paper we describe a closed loop blood pressure controller and show the results of its clinical evaluation. METHODS: The controller is based on a simple and robust Proportional-Integral controller and a supervising, rule based, expert system. Adaptive control is necessary because the sensitivity of the patients to sodium nitroprusside varies over a wide range. Thirty-three clinical tests during cardiac surgery, including the cardiopulmonary bypass phase, were performed. RESULTS: On average the controller was in automatic mode for 90.6 +/- 9.6% of the time. The performance during automatic control showed the mean arterial pressure to be within 10 mmHg of the setpoint for 71.4 +/- 15.5% of the time. The average absolute distance to the setpoint was 8.1 +/- 7.2 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of the controller was noted as very satisfactory by the anesthesiologists.
OBJECTIVE: During surgery, computers can be of great use to support the anesthesiologist in providing task automation. In this paper we describe a closed loop blood pressure controller and show the results of its clinical evaluation. METHODS: The controller is based on a simple and robust Proportional-Integral controller and a supervising, rule based, expert system. Adaptive control is necessary because the sensitivity of the patients to sodium nitroprusside varies over a wide range. Thirty-three clinical tests during cardiac surgery, including the cardiopulmonary bypass phase, were performed. RESULTS: On average the controller was in automatic mode for 90.6 +/- 9.6% of the time. The performance during automatic control showed the mean arterial pressure to be within 10 mmHg of the setpoint for 71.4 +/- 15.5% of the time. The average absolute distance to the setpoint was 8.1 +/- 7.2 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of the controller was noted as very satisfactory by the anesthesiologists.