Literature DB >> 9268426

Independent effects of palatability and within-meal pauses on intake and appetite ratings in human volunteers.

M R Yeomans1, R W Gray, C J Mitchell, S True.   

Abstract

The effects of the introduction of timed pauses within meals and palatability on food intake and changes in rated appetite during a meal were assessed in three experiments in which volunteers ate a lunch of pasta with a tomato sauce. Eating was monitored using a disguised electronic balance attached to a micro-computer, which also allowed the introduction of timed pauses within meals. In the first experiment, 16 subjects were tested with both a bland and palatable food (with 0.27% oregano), with eating uninterrupted or with pauses after every 50 g consumed during which appetite ratings were completed. Both the addition of oregano and the introduction of regular within-meal pauses enhanced overall intake. Rated hunger increased in the early stages of eating the palatable food in the interrupted condition, and then declined, whereas hunger declined throughout with the bland food. Similarly, the linear function relating intake to time in the uninterrupted condition was greater with the palatable food. In the second experiment, nine subjects ate the palatable food with no pauses within meals, with 30-second pauses with appetite ratings or with 30-second pauses in a non-appetite task. Intake was greater in both pause conditions than when eating was uninterrupted. In Experiment 3, the effect of pause duration was investigated in a further 16 subjects, with either no pause or a pause of 5, 30 or 60 seconds. Subjects ate more in all pause conditions than with no pauses, while ratings of hunger and fullness suggested that subjects were less satisfied at the end of the meal with longer pauses. These data confirm previous work which suggests that palatability exerts its effect by stimulating appetite and eating rate, but also suggest that the introduction of pauses within meals enhances intake as well, contradicting the idea that pausing within meals should reduce intake by allowing more time for post-ingestive satiety to develop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9268426     DOI: 10.1006/appe.1997.0092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  17 in total

1.  Development of bingeing in rats altered by a small operant requirement.

Authors:  F H E Wojnicki; D S Johnson; G Charny; R L W Corwin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-09-14

2.  The time-varying association between perceived stress and hunger within and between days.

Authors:  Jimi Huh; Mariya Shiyko; Stefan Keller; Genevieve Dunton; Susan M Schembre
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Project TwEATs. A feasibility study testing the use of automated text messaging to monitor appetite ratings in a free-living population.

Authors:  Susan M Schembre; Jessica Yuen
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Association of number of bites and eating speed with energy intake: Wearable technology results under free-living conditions.

Authors:  Nabil Alshurafa; Shibo Zhang; Christopher Romano; Hui Zhang; Angela Fidler Pfammatter; Annie W Lin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 5.  Nonnutritive sweetener consumption in humans: effects on appetite and food intake and their putative mechanisms.

Authors:  Richard D Mattes; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Effects of Peanut Processing on Masticatory Performance during Variable Appetitive States.

Authors:  Fiona McKiernan; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2009-11-19

7.  The influence of eating rate on satiety and intake among participants exhibiting high dietary restraint.

Authors:  Gregory J Privitera; Kathryn C Cooper; Alexis R Cosco
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  The Satiation Framework: Exploring processes that contribute to satiation.

Authors:  Paige M Cunningham; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-04-07

9.  Food intake is influenced by sensory sensitivity.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Gillian Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Does eating slowly influence appetite and energy intake when water intake is controlled?

Authors:  Ana M Andrade; Daniel L Kresge; Pedro J Teixeira; Fátima Baptista; Kathleen J Melanson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.