Literature DB >> 9267945

A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support.

S P Keenan1, K D Busche, L M Chen, L McCarthy, K J Inman, W J Sibbald.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of patients who died as a result of the withdrawal or withholding of life support (WD/WHLS) in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three teaching hospitals and to describe the process involved by determining: a) why the decision was made to withdraw support (WDLS); b) when WDLS took place; and c) how the WDLS process was conducted.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Three university-affiliated ICUs. PATIENTS: Four hundred nineteen patients who died in one of three academic, tertiary care ICUs over a 1-yr period.
INTERVENTIONS: Retrospective chart review. Data collected included age, gender, admitting diagnoses, comorbid disease, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and mode of death (brain death, death due to withholding of life support, death due to WDLS, or death despite ongoing therapy). For those patients dying due to WDLS, the reason for WDLS, person initiating discussion, timing of WDLS, degree of organ dysfunction, order of withdrawal of life support modalities, and the use of sedatives and analgesics were recorded.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy percent of patients died by WD/WHLS and 8.4% were brain dead. Patients undergoing WD/WHLS were older and had a longer length of stay than patients dying from other causes. Poor prognosis was the most common reason given for WDLS, reflected by significant organ dysfunction at the time of WDLS. Future quality of life was a less frequently cited reason. Most patients undergoing WDLS did so early in their ICU stay, although time to WDLS appeared to reflect diagnostic group. Few meetings occurred before WDLS and death occurred soon after initiating WDLS. There was a preference of withdrawing mechanical ventilation last and large amounts of morphine (mean 21 +/- 33 [SD] mg/hr) and benzodiazepines (mean 8.6 +/- 11 mg/hr) were used. Little variability in practice was apparent among the studied ICUs.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar to other studies, WD/WHLS was the most common cause of death in academic ICUs and poor patient prognosis was considered the most important factor in deciding on WDLS. However, in contrast to other studies, future quality of life was not as frequently cited a reason for WDLS and larger amounts of morphine were used during WDLS. These discrepancies suggest areas for potential future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9267945     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199708000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  41 in total

1.  Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine.

Authors:  M Ardagh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Conditions and consequences of medical futility--from a literature review to a clinical model.

Authors:  R Löfmark; T Nilstun
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units.

Authors:  C M Breen; A P Abernethy; K H Abbott; J A Tulsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Pattern of end-of-life decisions in two Tunisian intensive care units: the role of culture and intensivists' training.

Authors:  Islem Ouanes; Néji Stambouli; Fahmi Dachraoui; Lamia Ouanes-Besbes; Samir Toumi; Faouzi Ben Salem; Mourad Gahbiche; Fekri Abroug
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  [Chronic critical disease--what does the long-term patient imply for intensive medicine].

Authors:  Jürgen Graf; Uwe Janssens
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Integrating palliative and critical care: evaluation of a quality-improvement intervention.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Patsy D Treece; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Lois Downey; Sarah E Shannon; Theresa Braungardt; Darrell Owens; Kenneth P Steinberg; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Deciding in the dark: advance directives and continuation of treatment in chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Sharon L Camhi; Alice F Mercado; R Sean Morrison; Qingling Du; David M Platt; Gary I August; Judith E Nelson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS Study.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; Thomas Woodcock; Peter Sjokvist; Bara Ricou; Hans-Henrik Bulow; Anne Lippert; Paulo Maia; Simon Cohen; Mario Baras; Seppo Hovilehto; Didier Ledoux; Dermot Phelan; Elisabet Wennberg; Wolfgang Schobersberger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Factors associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Nicolas Côte; Alexis F Turgeon; François Lauzier; Lynne Moore; Damon C Scales; Francis Bernard; Ryan Zarychanski; Karen E A Burns; Maureen O Meade; David Zygun; Jean-François Simard; Amélie Boutin; Jacques G Brochu; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a Lebanese intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Alexandre Yazigi; Moussa Riachi; Georges Dabbar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-05       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.