Alexandre Yazigi1, Moussa Riachi, Georges Dabbar. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Adib Ishac Street, Beirut, Lebanon. ritalama@idm.net.lb
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation and process of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in an intensive care unit. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in the medical intensive care unit of a university hospital in Lebanon. PATIENTS: Forty-five consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU for a 1-year period and for whom a decision to withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment was made. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients were followed up until their death. Data regarding all aspects of the implementation and the process of withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment were recorded by a senior staff nurse. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment was applied to 9.6% of all admitted patients to ICU. Therapies were withheld in 38% and were withdrawn in 7% of patients who died. Futility of care and poor quality of life were the two most important factors supporting these decisions. The nursing staff was not involved in 26% of the decisions to limit care. Families were not implicated in 21% of the cases. Decisions were not notified in the patients' medical record in 23% of the cases. Sixty-three percent of patients did not have a sedative or an analgesic to treat discomfort during end-of-life care. CONCLUSIONS: Life-sustaining treatment were frequently withheld or withdrawn from adult patients in the Lebanese ICU. Cultural differences and the lack of guidelines and official statements could explain the ethical limitations of the decision-making process recorded in this study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation and process of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in an intensive care unit. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in the medical intensive care unit of a university hospital in Lebanon. PATIENTS: Forty-five consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU for a 1-year period and for whom a decision to withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment was made. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS:Patients were followed up until their death. Data regarding all aspects of the implementation and the process of withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment were recorded by a senior staff nurse. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment was applied to 9.6% of all admitted patients to ICU. Therapies were withheld in 38% and were withdrawn in 7% of patients who died. Futility of care and poor quality of life were the two most important factors supporting these decisions. The nursing staff was not involved in 26% of the decisions to limit care. Families were not implicated in 21% of the cases. Decisions were not notified in the patients' medical record in 23% of the cases. Sixty-three percent of patients did not have a sedative or an analgesic to treat discomfort during end-of-life care. CONCLUSIONS: Life-sustaining treatment were frequently withheld or withdrawn from adult patients in the Lebanese ICU. Cultural differences and the lack of guidelines and official statements could explain the ethical limitations of the decision-making process recorded in this study.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach
Authors: F Pochard; E Azoulay; S Chevret; F Lemaire; P Hubert; P Canoui; M Grassin; R Zittoun; J R le Gall; J F Dhainaut; B Schlemmer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-02-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Hans-Henrik Bülow; Charles L Sprung; Konrad Reinhart; Shirish Prayag; Bin Du; Apostolos Armaganidis; Fekri Abroug; Mitchell M Levy Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-12-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Rohit K Singal; Robert Sibbald; Brenda Morgan; Mel Quinlan; Neil Parry; Michael Radford; Claudio M Martin Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 2.409