Literature DB >> 9267792

A comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analysis of utility assessments of patients and physicians.

C L Bennett1, G Chapman, A S Elstein, S J Knight, R B Nadler, R Sharifi, T Kuzel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality-of-life considerations are important in metastatic prostate cancer. In this study, we interviewed physicians and patients about their assessments and expectations on quality of life as metastatic prostate cancer progresses.
METHODS: Physicians and patients made utility assessments of three hypothetical health states for metastatic disease using the time trade-off technique. Scores were bounded on a scale from 0.0 (death) to 1.0 (perfect health).
RESULTS: Patients rated each of the health states as less desirable than the physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and patients differ in their perspectives on expected quality of life with metastatic prostate cancer. Our results emphasize the need to assess patients' utilities directly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9267792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  7 in total

1.  Testing subject comprehension of utility questionnaires.

Authors:  Deborah G Dobrez; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  A review of quality-of-life evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  S D Sommers; S D Ramsey
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Patient-Clinician choice in palliation of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V Kaisary
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  A multi-attribute model of prostate cancer patient's preferences for health states.

Authors:  G B Chapman; A S Elstein; T M Kuzel; R B Nadler; R Sharifi; C L Bennett
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments in patients with advanced cancer of the prostate.

Authors:  Jan Adolfsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Prostate cancer and health-related quality of life: a review of the literature.

Authors:  David T Eton; Stephen J Lepore
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Scott B Cantor; Alvah R Cass; Stephen J Spann; Susan C Weller; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.