Literature DB >> 9267695

Modeling the mechanical behavior of vertebral trabecular bone: effects of age-related changes in microstructure.

M J Silva1, L J Gibson.   

Abstract

Age-related reductions in the thickness and number of trabeculae in vertebral trabecular bone have been documented by several workers, yet the relative effects of these changes on mechanical properties are not known. We developed a two-dimensional model of human vertebral trabecular bone and investigated its mechanical behavior using finite element analysis. The stress-strain behavior, failure mode, and strain distributions predicted using the model were consistent with those observed for vertebral trabecular bone under compressive loading. Random reductions in the number of trabeculae reduced the modulus and strength of the models two to five times more than uniform reductions in the thickness of trabeculae that caused the same loss of bone volume. For example, randomly removing longitudinal trabeculae to achieve a reduction in density of 10% reduced the strength by approximately 70%, whereas removing the same amount of bone by uniformly reducing the thickness of the longitudinal trabeculae only reduced the strength by approximately 20%. For a simulation of aged bone, in which the thickness and number of trabeculae were reduced concurrently, the strength was 23% of its intact ("young") value. When the bone mass of the aged model was restored to its intact level by increasing the thickness but not the number of trabeculae, the strength increased by 60%, but was still only 37% of its intact value. These combined findings, based on a two-dimensional, idealized model of vertebral trabecular bone, illustrate the importance of maintaining trabecular number and suggest that it may not be possible to restore bone strength following a period of advanced bone loss if a substantial number of trabeculae have been resorbed. Thus, until treatments exist that can increase trabecular number, the most effective treatment strategy is to prevent the degradation of bone strength by maintaining the number of trabeculae at a healthy level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9267695     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00100-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  57 in total

Review 1.  Whole bone mechanics and bone quality.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Cole; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Multi-scale modelling of elastic moduli of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Elham Hamed; Iwona Jasiuk; Andrew Yoo; Yikhan Lee; Tadeusz Liszka
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Functional interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits define bone quality.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Bone Imaging and Fracture Risk after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  W Brent Edwards; Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  The effect of a short-term delay of puberty on trabecular bone mass and structure in female rats: a texture-based and histomorphometric analysis.

Authors:  Vanessa R Yingling; Yongqing Xiang; Theodore Raphan; Mitchell B Schaffler; Karen Koser; Rumena Malique
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Association of dietary and biochemical measures of vitamin K with quantitative ultrasound of the heel in men and women.

Authors:  R R McLean; S L Booth; D P Kiel; K E Broe; D R Gagnon; K L Tucker; L A Cupples; M T Hannan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Testing two predictions for fracture load using computer models of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Michael A K Liebschner; Ralph Müller; Sunil J Wimalawansa; Chamith S Rajapakse; Gemunu H Gunaratne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  A biomechanical analysis of the effects of resorption cavities on cancellous bone strength.

Authors:  Christopher J Hernandez; Atul Gupta; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 10.  Update in male osteoporosis.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.