Literature DB >> 9265191

Computer-enhanced emotion in facial expressions.

A J Calder1, A W Young, D Rowland, D I Perrett.   

Abstract

Benson & Perrett's (1991 b) computer-based caricature procedure was used to alter the positions of anatomical landmarks in photographs of emotional facial expressions with respect to their locations in a reference norm face (e.g. a neutral expression). Exaggerating the differences between an expression and its norm produces caricatured images, whereas reducing the differences produces 'anti-caricatures'. Experiment 1 showed that caricatured (+50% different from neutral) expressions were recognized significantly faster than the veridical (0%, undistorted) expressions. This held for all six basic emotions from the Ekman & Friesen (1976) series, and the effect generalized across different posers. For experiment 2, caricatured (+50%) and anti-caricatured (-50%) images were prepared using two types of reference norm; a neutral-expression norm, which would be optimal if facial expression recognition involves monitoring changes in the positioning of underlying facial muscles, and a perceptually-based norm involving an average of the expressions of six basic emotions (excluding neutral) in the Ekman & Friesen (1976) series. The results showed that the caricatured images were identified significantly faster, and the anti-caricatured images significantly slower, than the veridical expressions. Furthermore, the neutral-expression and average-expression norm caricatures produced the same pattern of results.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9265191      PMCID: PMC1688436          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  7 in total

1.  A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

2.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey.

Authors:  M E Hasselmo; E T Rolls; G C Baylis
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1989-04-01       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on identity and expression.

Authors:  A W Young; K H McWeeny; D C Hay; A W Ellis
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

4.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: implications for mental representations of faces.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Brennan; S Carey
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information.

Authors:  D M Burt; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: a reply to Russell's mistaken critique.

Authors:  P Ekman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Face perception after brain injury. Selective impairments affecting identity and expression.

Authors:  A W Young; F Newcombe; E H de Haan; M Small; D C Hay
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 13.501

  7 in total
  21 in total

1.  Time courses of left and right amygdalar responses to fearful facial expressions.

Authors:  M L Phillips; N Medford; A W Young; L Williams; S C Williams; E T Bullmore; J A Gray; M J Brammer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Mapping the time course of nonconscious and conscious perception of fear: an integration of central and peripheral measures.

Authors:  Leanne M Williams; Belinda J Liddell; Jennifer Rathjen; Kerri J Brown; Jeffrey Gray; Mary Phillips; Andy Young; Evian Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Categorical perception of facial expressions: evidence for a "category adjustment" model.

Authors:  Debi Roberson; Lubica Damjanovic; Michael Pilling
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

4.  Neural responses to facial expressions support the role of the amygdala in processing threat.

Authors:  Giulia Mattavelli; Mladen Sormaz; Tessa Flack; Aziz U R Asghar; Siyan Fan; Julia Frey; Luis Manssuer; Deniz Usten; Andrew W Young; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Neural responses to facial and vocal expressions of fear and disgust.

Authors:  M L Phillips; A W Young; S K Scott; A J Calder; C Andrew; V Giampietro; S C Williams; E T Bullmore; M Brammer; J A Gray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  A Model of the Perception of Facial Expressions of Emotion by Humans: Research Overview and Perspectives.

Authors:  Aleix Martinez; Shichuan Du
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.654

7.  Differential effects of tryptophan depletion on emotion processing according to face direction.

Authors:  Justin H G Williams; David I Perrett; Gordon D Waiter; Stephen Pechey
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Elevated amygdala activity to sad facial expressions: a state marker of bipolar but not unipolar depression.

Authors:  Jorge R C Almeida; Amelia Versace; Stefanie Hassel; David J Kupfer; Mary L Phillips
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Keep smiling! Facial reactions to emotional stimuli and their relationship to emotional contagion in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Irina Falkenberg; Mathias Bartels; Barbara Wild
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  Morphing between expressions dissociates continuous from categorical representations of facial expression in the human brain.

Authors:  Richard J Harris; Andrew W Young; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.